Anybody actually shoot with iron sights anymore?
Hey all,
I have a question about the Air Force Iron Sights.
Does anyone use them with any good results? I have heard they are just “OK”.
Specifically does anyone target shoot with them? I would like to use them to shoot targets, but I wondered if they are any good. I am quite used to iron sights as regularly shoot pistols with iron sights. But it doesn’t seem like any Air Force owners really like the iron sights(?).
Thanks,
Lochman
All Replies
Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
Viewing 12 replies - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
5 Comments
-
Pingback: ไข่สั่น
-
Pingback: Onlineshop Badetuch Bassetti
-
Pingback: chicken road official app
-
Pingback: สูตรหวยวิ่งยอดนิยม ที่คอหวยใช้กันจริง
-
Pingback: เกมสล็อตออนไลน์จาก Nextspin

I know this is an old dead thread, but perhaps someone someday will be searching posts (like I just was) and find it.
Most people who complain about the inherent in accuracy of iron sights are talking about open sights. Aperture sights, however can often be more accurate than scopes. For optics to be accurate, you have two options. You either need to look strait down the center of the optic, or you have to control the eye relief so that the optic can accurately use lenses to compensate for an you not looking down the center. Ultimately, parallax error happens because nothing forces you to look down the center of the scope or use perfect eye relief. (The perfect eye relief issue is more readily understood when using holographic sights)
Aperture sights force you to look down the center. There can be very little parallax error. It is entirely possible to shoot sub moa with aperture sights (optically the aperture also helps with field of view issues allowing the shooter to focus better. Great shooters can and do regularly stack pellets at 10m. When doing an instructor’s class we did a test to determine accuracy of aperture sights (no shots fired, just sight testing. Most of us could discern +/- 1/32 inch at about 10m. I doubt a scope with parallax error will normally do much better.
—-
I need to edit to add this. The usability and accuracy of any sights are dependent on conditions. Aperture sights gain a lot of their usability through near perfect conditions. Paper targets are high contrast, well lit, known distance and uniform size. Using the right front incert – you really are not aiming at the center of the bulls eye (nobody can see a rifle 10 ring at 10m), but centering the entire bulls-eye in a circle in the insert. The human eye is pretty good at discerning that the ring of white between the bulls-eye and the insert circle not uniform (it’s wider or brighter or it just doesn’t feel balanced). As such we can adjust for things that we really can not “see”-such as the 10 ring. Real world usage hunting, does not allow the use of such tricks. Aperture sights are still easier to use than iron, but adverse conditions (poor lighting, poor contrast, etc..) do favor optics.