More on the FX Royale 500 magazine
I put on some 5 dioper close-work magnifying glasses for this. They’re a pain because the focal length is not far from nose length. But, real handy for this kind of stuff.
First, it looks like the spring tension in the mag is not much of an issue at all. After filling the mag, I used a hard wooden rod, about the size of the Royale’s to push out the pellets, cycle through the mag and watch the motions inside the mag. The black fins of the mag absorb the vast majority of the impact as the mag advances. In other words, as a pellet is pushed out, the “click” you hear is actually the plastic fin, around the next pellet, striking the loading rod.
As the rod backs out, the mag advances a tiny bit, 1-2 mm, as the pellet lines up (fin passes by). This short travel doesn’t allow time/distance for significant acceleration under spring tension. I ran the same group of JSB Kings, twice, through the mag and found no sign of damage. This should be good news to those of us worried/curious about the mag. It was good to see the plastic fin whacking the loading rod instead of the pellet skirt.
To reduce the tight fit while loading, rather than taking the mag apart, I used a very sharp, small X-acto knife, under magnification, through the clear cover hole, to shave a little off the black chambers, where needed. Load the first “jam” pellet and move the cover to each chamber. You need to move the cover back and forth to give greater access, and pulling the blade helped drag out plastic slivers. Tapping and blowing from the back/black side with canned air gets rid of most of the remaining bits. Frankly, A tiny bit of plastic dust going down the barrel isn’t worrisome; it’ll blow out. A more thorough air blasting would likely get the thing plenty clean.
Unlike a Dremel, the knife makes small curls which are easier to get out. The blade was sharpened on an Arkansas stone-super sharp. This won’t work with a dull blade. We’re also talking about tiny amounts of plastic getting shaved on maybe 4-5 of the chambers, generally opposite the first “jam” pellet. It’s also possible that other pellets don’t require any mag tinkering.
Finally got a ProChrono, so plan on using it this weekend to generate some numbers.
All Replies
Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Bet it wasn’t scary enough to keep you off the steps 😉
Still got one chamber where the pellet won’t drop in, but it’s close. Shot a few mags worth before dark yesterday; the winds died down. Everything worked great, fine accuracy. Waiting to see if any of the three Ballistic and friends got had any issues. Mine might be a fluke or “older” model.