Edgun Matador vs Theoben Rapid
Good evening everyone,
My name is Ben, and I reside in South Africa.
This forum has been a wealth of information regarding the Edgun Matador, and I’ve thoroughly enjoyed reading the various posts regarding this phenomenal air rifle.
Due to its increasing popularity and the numerous reviews speaking so highly of it, I ordered one.
I’m currently anxiously awaiting its arrival. But alas, it seems that I have come to an impasse regarding my decision.
I was lucky enough in the sense that the dealer of Edguns in my country has ordered a bunch of Matadors, thus negating the need to place a deposit. Furthermore, I was in the fortunate position that I phoned early enough to secure a place on this most exclusive list.
So what’s the problem, you may ask? Well in short…Theobens.
The importer of Theoben in my country is offering a fully regulated and gauged MK2 Rapid for approx. $700 less than a Matador. It’s brand new with the Theoben aftermarket reg and gauge pre-installed at the factory. The caliber is .20.
My questions are as follows:
1. Considering the price, is the Theoben a better choice?
2. The dealer was advocating the .20 as a better long range caliber than .22. Is this the case? I’m interested since I plan to use the rifle at ranges in excess of 60yrds.
3. I went to view a Theoben next to a Matador, and the finish on the Theoben left me wanting. Essentially it looked unfinished. The Matador looked much better. Is Theoben’s quality control slipping? Does the Theoben require some “assembly” before reaching its full potential?
Seeing that no deposit was placed, I have no financial obligation to take the Edgun. The dealer won’t be put out in the cold either, since if I don’t take the Matador, there would definitely be someone else interested.
I would like to thank everyone in advance for any input and advice provided.
Kindest regards,
Ben.
All Replies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Good evening everyone.
I just want to thank everyone yet again for all the advice given.
I’m still anxiously awaiting the removal of my sling so that I can finally mount a scope on my new Edgun and properly test it.
In the last couple of weeks I’ve been fondling my new toy much like an over eater would a tub of ice cream he keeps in the freezer below the health food. He can’t eat it, but keeps it there…close by….sometimes stroking it…lovingly…
Whilst carefully examining my Matador (since that is all I practically do), I noticed some small imperfections in the wood (tool marks I suppose, they have been sanded out, so not to be felt, but definitely still visible) and in the finish on the metal of the receiver. The receiver seems to be blued as opposed to being anodized.
In short the bluing seems very thin. It’s almost as if the metal is starting to shine through. I also noticed some dents in the metal. The dents seem to be blued, so they did not happen after bluing.
There seems to be a lot of blemishes in the bolt finish as well. It is not polished to the same standard that I have come to expect from other manufacturers.
I don’t want to blow anything out of proportion. The marks are small, and to most people probably insignificant. I also realize that this rifle is hand built, and small foibles are part of the appeal. I guess what I mean to say is that I did not expect to find so many imperfections. Daystates and Steyers are around the same price as the Edgun, and I can’t recall finding as many blemishes on the samples I inspected.
It’s not my intention to start an argument with the previous statement. I do realize each manufacturer carries an unique set of merits. I did not purchase the rifle so that it can be put on display. The Edgun was built to perform. I get that. That’s why I bought it, I just want to inquire whether anyone else has experienced something similar with their Edguns in terms of finish, so that I can know whether or not I got a “Friday” rifle.
On a totally different note, in terms of optics, what is the minimum magnification you would recommend for shooting at 100m? Not competitively, but for fun. I’ve only shot past 70m a couple of times, and each time I cranked the scope up to 14x on my S410. Since that rifle was sold to fund the Edgun, I don’t have a reference frame to compare anymore.
Thanks a bunch!