Why the bias for Air Force airguns?
Alright, I admit I’m a newbie and I don’t yet own an AF rifle. I also admit I bought a very nice foreign made PCP to get my feet wet, but since then I’ve been wanting to step up for both power and quiet to hunt more. I’m involuntarily retired so I have a lot of energy to channel and I read a lot of forums, articles, etc. I also shoot my CZ almost every day. I almost always at least look at fellow newbie posts to see what other people are asking and looking for so I don’t leave something out on my next purchase. To me that’s part of learning the game? Why is it that when I see a post for “high end airguns” or an “I want to spend “X” amount of dollars (usually $1000’s) to hunt and shoot targets” post that I never see AF rifles suggested or recommended?
I realize we live in a global economy and I’ve been fortunate to have been able to sample some of the best England, Sweden, Germany, The Czech Republic, and Tennessee have to offer, most costing in excess of $1000. They make some really nice rifles! Almost all needing some degree of modification to up the power or quiet the noise or whatever?
I’m a Texan and a lifelong hunter and the cost, reputation for both power and quiet, and the further degree of improvement available from and for AF seems like a no brainer to me? I know I’m becoming a bit of a curmudgeon, but is it the jarhead coming out in me or am I missing something when AF’s aren’t represented?
Sorry for my Buy American rant, when I drove a tractor on the Katy prairie I had an “Eat More Rice” bumper sticker on my pickup truck. It’s what I am!
👿 Will 😈
All Replies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.




The Airforce line is a utilitarian product. It gets the job done. The barrels are good quality, the valve is about as consistent as you can ask for without a regulator. As such is is powerful and accurate. That said, it is not much of a work of art. No beautiful bluing, not wonderful wood. It is harder to shoot than some rifles since the ergonomics demands a high scope. Likewise the valve is not incredibly efficient – uses air liberally.
If cost is not an issue, there are other rifles out there that do some (if not all) things better. Given the cost of the complete pcp package, it is easy to see people dropping a few more hundred to get something that they perceive is better.
—
Worked out hard this weekend and am sore all over. Tried to shoot some and there was no way I was going to shoulder my talon and lower my head to look through the scope. Just too sore and too hard to get my head down.m Going to order taller rings tonight. Have not worked up my drop tables, but will need to factor in sight height a bit when I do.