Condor for shooting cast boolits?
Boattail boolits have a 3 times advantage in Ballistic coefficient and theoretical 3 times advantage in cross wind group size. But boolits are heavy and need more spin than pellets. The Condor can easily develope enough energy to throw a 51 gn boolit at 850 fps but Bob’s new design requires at least 1:16 twist for optimal stability and Walther lists the airgun barrels at 1:17.7 which might not be enough for this design. I’m thinking of buying a new Condor SS for shooting home cast boolits. Can someone here measure the twist rate of the stock barrel by pushing a patch through to see how far it takes for the rod to go 1 revolution? Here is the link to the new mold design.
.
http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=58933.0
.
All Replies
Viewing 14 replies - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
Viewing 14 replies - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



What the heck… LW is specifying a .254 bore choked to .248 now? That sounds like a problem to me; I don’t size my slugs .006 in a nice, lubed die! I know LW had a quality issue but I had hoped they were over it. Slugging a barrel isn’t hard, owners should learn what they have.
BTW, I have designed and made some round nose, boat tail slugs for my .32 guns. The velocity at range confirms the aero efficiency but the story reveals other variables. One of my .32s does not like the slugs that much at all, the other shoots them at .3 MOA @ 100 yards! The accurate gun only likes the slugs when loaded backwards though! The barrels have minor differences and both have shot below .4 MOA @ 100 yards. There’s a lot more to accuracy than just aero performance. For my guns, I think the difference comes down to chambering.