….and another Jack Haley .32
In truth, I’d had my Haley gun quite a bit longer than Tofaz, but I have to admit that reading his post on him tearing down his gun and reworking it really got me itching to do the same to mine.
My Haley .32 is a bit weaker from the start. I specifically asked for a gun in the 40fpe range to use for small game and Jack supplied me with a QB action that was getting around 650fps with the 45gr round balls. It was grouping fine… minute of squirrel head at 50 yards… and I was happy with it.
Until I read Tofaz’s post… 😯
I decided a couple weekends ago to tear her down for a clean, polish, and port.
I got all the tools I thought I’d need and went to work….

The gun itself
Some Permalyn finish since I’ll have the stock off anyway and a lint free cloth to apply it
A gunsmith tool kit and a couple sets of needle files
A Gerber multi tool (with bottle opener)
Some various left over O-Rings
Tombstone…for some background noise. Great movie.
Channel locks
JB Bore paste
A dremel
A bag of various junk… screws, springs, sears, any and everything. ‘The bag ‘o shit’ always accompanies me when I start a project
And finally, some liquid inspiration
With all that hardware, I went to work. I took the stock off and hit it with a maroon scotchbrite pad to rough it up and then applied a coat of Permalyn. I set it aside to dry while I went to tear down the QB.
I had a bitch of a time getting it back together and really didnt do a lot with it until this weekend when I tore into it again for a bit of porting on the valve.
I shot a couple chrony strings with it and ended up with some very nice numbers…
Starting fill 160bar, ending fill 110 bar.
Using .310 Round balls at 45gr
728
730
736
737
739
737
739
734
734
726
734
722
715
Some informal groups at a steel plate at 50 yards showed the groups had tightened considerably from what they were.

All Replies
Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Viewing 10 replies - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Yep, Rob, Twist rates in the DAQ and JH are different.