Q:

Attack of the Clones – The all new P12 Bullpup

Please guys, I will remind you that this is a world stage and this is the first time this rifle has been on show in the public eye.. This thread will be the first and only info on this bullpup until its distributed. This thread will come up on many web search engines and will be read buy thousands of potential customers and also the manufacturer. Can I please ask that you keep it on topic throughout the duration of the review.. Regards, Wingman.

There has been much talk of a Bullpup some say an EDgun clone from China yet no one has actually handled one or
in fact seen one other than a few photo-shopped factory images on the interweb..

Until now that is..

I have just taken delivery of the two very first production prototypes for testing and review purposes, one in .177 and one in .22 and for the curious minds out there Im going to completely tare these down and compare them to their European counterparts for you all and answer every question you and the manufacturer want answered..
At this stage this rifle is not available but to the public but once the manufacturer gets the required feedback on their new product and make any modifications needed they will hit production and be distributed to their representatives around the globe. You cant buy these directly from the factory unless you are a representative as they don’t deal directly with the public and they have a minimum purchase number of 100 units. Please don’t ask me what these will retail for as it will depend entirely on your location and local distributors costs and mark ups. However I can tell you it will be cheaper (much cheaper) than any other bullpup currently available on today’s market.

Will this new low priced Bullpup compete with the European bullpup market needing very few mods right out of the box?
….or will it always be an entry level rough around the edge rifle with the quality resembling a the QB series of rifle etc that the tinkerers on a budget among us will flock to and replace every part on the rifle until it no longer resembles its original form and end up with something they can never recover their cost on when they eventually get pissed off with it and sell to buy the European Gun they wished they had bough in the first place..

Here is the Factory info on this pup before I get into this..
They are made by the Snow Peak Airgun factory in Shaoxing China who are well know for making cheap springer’s, some owners have remarked that they have been of reasonable quality but I have never owned or inspected one so I will not comment.

Snow peak Airgun factory was established in 1976 and at present, the company has 10 series with more than 30 specifications of airgun products, and owns several patents. The company also cooperates with internationally well-known airgun brands, and is rich in mature OEM experiences with a strong design and R&D team, they boast a first-class quality control system and testing equipments.
PCP Rifles are a new venture for Snow peak and they are gearing up to produce two PCP rifles, the M10 which looks to be a Air Arms S400 clone and this one the P12 bullpup which will be the subject of this independent review.

This is the manufacturers specs for the P12 bullpup they have released on their website.

MODEL P12 Bullpup
Magazine capacity: Single shot
Manual safety
Available in .177 (4.5 mm), .22 (5.5 mm) calibres.
Air tube volume: 317cc
Fill pressure: 20mPA, 200 Bar, 2900Psi
Precision rifled steel barrel for accuracy.
Scope mount rail & shock absorber scope stop.
Stock: European hard wood
Over all length: 710mm (28”)
Weight 3.1kg (6.8lbs)
Max velocity: 4.5mm (.177cal) 1100fps
5.5mm (.22cal) 1100fps

Please note this will be an evolving thread with an extensive unbiased review that tests every component of these PSP’s professionally and thoroughly.
I will first test and provide data on the rifles exactly as they arrived from the factory floor and then (should I need to) I will provide a list of all defects, point out any “quirks” and improvements needed to bring them up to an international standard.

Once all testing and data collection is done going onto a section of “extensive modification and tuning” in an attempt to get this Bullpup to be “all it can be”
I have a stock of new .177 and .22 L/W and BSA match barrels should the stock barrels be less than perfect.

Where is the .25cal model I also hear you all ask? I also have two new .25cal match grade barrels, one BSA and the other Lothar Walther that will I test on this platform for all those modders out there with the burning desire for more energy..

I know there will be plenty of questions rattling around out there already but please allow me the time to finish this first section before slamming me with them as I will do my best to leave all questions unanswered in the initial review.. I will be open to all questions and suggestions once I complete this initial review and start on the field testing stage.

First up.. The un-boxing… second…the strip down and comparisons, is it actually a clone?

The boxes The P12s were shipped in were unremarkable, just the usual Chinese brown box with the stamped on black writing..
Two rifles were packed in the one box and both had the model and calibre marked on the ends.


Inside the rifles were secured in place with some high density foam, no way they could move but a sharp blow to the top of
the package could go through the two layers of cardboard and cause damage for sure. I would be nice to see a layer of foam on the top as well.


A bag of bits is taped to the inside of the box, but not well enough… the bag can sill rattle around within the box and
contact the stock.. both rifles had small dents in the lower stock caused by the metal parts in the bag..



The rifle comes shipped with an operators manual, some spare O rings, 4 Allen wrenches, a fill probe and a male foster fitting for the probe.. a nice addition for sure! Even the Allen wrenches are of good quality and Im still not sure if shipping a PCP with tools to fix it is a good thing or a bad thing.. The spare O rings are very soft and of low quality.. they would be be better replaced with some nitrile or poly 70 durometer if you can get them. The probe comes without the O rings fitted so I fitted some good quality ones from the get go..


There is a small collar on the bottom of the probe that the thicker Oring supplied fits onto sealing it inside the foster fitting. I chose to leave this out and fitted mine with a dowdy washer instead. Just a note, all the gas threads (Probe and gauge) on these guns are 1/8 NPT not 1/8 BSP.. this is the standard for most Chinese made air guns. Both rifles came shipped basically empty, there was about 5 bar in the cylinders just to keep the O rings good.

First Impressions:
The build quality of these rifles is actually really good… well better than I had expected anyway..

The bluing on the steel barrels is perfect and I can not fault it, the machining tolerances and threading etc is great.. the alloy parts have been bead blasted and anodised and I had to look pretty close to spot any machining marks at all! The alloy has a charcoal matte finish that I personally prefer for all types of air rifles.

There is a few very small blemishes in the breech on the .177 which looks like small pits but the .22 is spot on.
The finish on the cylinder is very average and it marks very easily, there is parts at the front of the cylinders on both rifles where the alloy is “grinning” through the black anodizing where it looks worn.. more on this later..

The rifles I received have been fitted with a new Weaver stile rail rather than the 11mm dovetail pictured on the Snow Peak website.. Great!

They are easy enough to cock and push the bolt home with ease! The safety mechanism is in the front of the trigger and operates like a Benjamin Marauders safety, back for safe and forward to fire. Not every one cup of tea! But better than nothing, I suppose a non-loaded rifle is better, load when ready to shoot. is the key!
The triggers were set as a two stage with a little bit of gritty creep then about a 2 lbs break.
Not perfect but I have felt worse for sure..


I filled them both and dry fired them, they are both very loud and would lean toward wearing earmuffs… yup “that loud”.. they have a shocking PING that resonates for about 5 seconds after the shot! Both guns have breach leaks from the bolt probes and the front of the breach where the barrels fit up which Im glad I found before I put my face to the action! I will sort that little issue later too..

The P12 is fitted with an integral forward mounted glow in the dark pressure gauge to keep the shooter informed of all-important residual pressure even on those night hunts..
TIP: don’t trust the pressure gauge on the P12 rifle! They are cheap and in both cases inaccurate when compared to several of my dive bottle gauges, the rifle in the pic below has exactly 200 bar in the tank tested on both my dive bottle gauges.. however, it reads 220bar on the guns manometer.

Always fill to the gauge on the dive bottle/pump not the one on the gun.
I will be replacing my cylinder gauges with good quality units in the near future.

What really grabs the eye with these new China dolls is the stock design woodwork fashioned unusually from what I’m pretty sure is is beach wood. I is much lighter in colour than the stock pictured on the Snow Peak website, It is more of a honey tone but the wood grain looks good and has no voids or knots. There is a few darker areas where they needed more sanding before the final finish was applied but it could easily be stained and refinished or repainted to the owners preference.




P12

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 406 through 420 (of 451 total)

1 2 3 27 28 29 30 31

Wingman. How’s the trigger weight? Have you put a scale on it? And as far as potential what do u think of the trigger mechanism?

Ride; I have asked the guys at SP many questions but only get the answers for some.. By the looks of this .177 it has had at the least 1000 pellets through it before they sent it to me, maybe a lot more.. the shroud is grey with lead dust, the bolt probe O ring is worn out to the point of leaking, the pellet feeding area in front of the transfer tube is caked with flakey lead, there is wear marks on all moving surfaces especially between the sear and the hammer.. Yet the .22cal was totally unfired.

I beleive I am the lab guinea pig to test this rig to its breaking point…
Currently the .177 is out of action as I found a problem with it and I have relayed it back to SP.
A couple of major parts are needed so this will test their back up service and business integrty as well.
I will update with pics and an explanation shortly but for now the review will go on with the .22 cal only. Is there any thing else anyone wants to see tested on the .22 in its out of box state before I tune and mod it?

Excellent report Wing!!! i see that little chinese gun has a lot potential, with some TLC it can become a great rifle! i might found my next .177 pup! :biggrinn:
looking forward for the next chapter!!! :8:

Wingman

Feeding the data for the 0.22 into Excel I made a few observations. With the current state of the gun the speeds drop away after 29 shots. If we cut off at 29 shots the data look as follow:
Avg = 930.4 fpe = 34.86
Hi = 941 fpe = 35.66
Low = 922 fpe = 34.23
ES = 19

If all the leaks are fixed and the speed tuned down a bit and a few other bits and bobs this might turn out to be another love affair.

Paul

Wing, Have you asked Snow Peak how much testing they have done, not so much long term but maybe high shot counts. Has anyone run 2500, 5000 or 10000 shots through one to see how it is holding up on things like the plastic stem ??? Dosent seem like a to much to expect as a lot of us shoot a 1000 round just playing and tuning in the first month, maybe more.

quote steeldreams007:

Thank you so much for the very comprehensive review. It is a lot of work and dedication put into your writeup.

One question though.. why not a regulator?

Im not sure.. there is a smooth machined section inside the cylinder where a reg would fit but it is M.I.A… maybe it still needs work?? maybe it never existed..
When I first asked Snow peak if it had one this is the answer I got.. kind of a double meaning:

me:
>Is the P12 fitted with an air regulator?
Is the power/speed output adjustable?

reply:
> yes, it have regulator, can adjust the speed and the power.

> Best regards
——-
> Shaoxing Snowpeak Air Gun Factory

Thank you so much for the very comprehensive review. It is a lot of work and dedication put into your writeup.

One question though.. why not a regulator?

Nice WINGMAN. that .22 string for just cranking it up an shooting it looks great!!!! thats got me excited too!!! and that 50 yard grouping looks dam fine for a chinese air gun out of the box. these china dolls are looking good :7: :7: :7:

[size=10pt][color=teal]I gave both bores a really good clean, which I strongly recommend doing as soon as you take it out of the box because these things were filthy!

Then a quick refill and back on the bench for an out of the box accuracy test at 50 yards, I shot the same 18.13gr pellets and after only 5 sighter’s to zero the scope, I positioned my hand over the leaking breech and rested my cheek on that…. I was amazed! The .22 produced this beautiful 10 shot group! 😀 :8:
The bulls eye is 1/2″

This rifle has fired less than 70 shots and surely can only get better with a break in period and a good tune.. I think the 18.1gr pellets are a good match so far..

The .177 however had some mechanical difficulties, in the first few shots will zeroing the scope the pellets began to jam in the breech requiring to be pushed out with a cleaning rod.. now what could cause this I thought? Maybe a build up of lead scale? Shooting two terrible 10 shot groups with both the 10.34gr pellets and the 8.44gr pellets I was getting a jam about every second pellet so take these groups for what they are worth, I have no doubt there was pellet damage on all pellets fired..

Something is very wrong.. the pellets I pushed back out the breech seemed to be digging their nose in and catching bad in an edge of some sort..

Finally I got one really jammed and decided to slip the barrel out to inspect the cause..

Some time in my scope zero session the O ring I fitted to the barrel had been blasted out.. it wasn’t in the suppressor either.. These O rings weren’t present on either rifle when I received them although I did dry fire them both right after I un-boxed them which may have blown them out?

The pellets were dropping their heads into the O rings void and catching on the sharp metal edge..
I will spend some time and remedy this issue before testing again. I think the O rings are just to soft for this application they almost feel like silicone O rings and stretch like a rubber band! I will replace both these and the bolt probe O rings on both guns with a harder 90 durometer O ring.
The breech leaks are very loud and some what uncomfortable.. so I will look into both theses issues before running these tests again.

So even with both breech’s leaking badly I decided to do an out of the box chrony shot string.. both rifles had the HST back right off though so I decided to tackle it a little differently..

I wound both rifles right up full bore on the HST and shot heavy pellets to show the maximum amount of air these things could use.. I will do some proper fine tuning and pellet test in the tuning section of this review.

So here it goes.. Both rifles were 200 bar fills shot down to 120 bar: Keep in mind the massive breech leaks..

The .22 cal was first.. I shot 18.13gr EDgun match pellets with the head size of 5.54mm (JSB 18.13gr) a total of 45 shots taken:

200bar 929 931 930 930 932 924 930 927 926 935 927 925 931 931 936 934 936 941 931 933 937 929 932 934 934 931 928 927 923 929 922 919 917 915 910 910 905 902 901 898 891 120bar 890 885 881 871

Next the .177 cal with 10.34gr Edgun match pellets with the head size of 4.52mm (JSB 10.4gr) a total of 50 shots taken

977 978 974 974 974 978 980 978 978 971 975 972 978 974 974 969 969 973 977 967 967 969 974 969 972 973 973 971 967 969 973 969 963 967 965 965 963 961 962 963 956 955 954 953 952 952 948 948 947 945 120bar 941 936 937 935

Now these numbers wont mean a lot to the guys out there who have never tuned an unregulated gun but to be honest they get me quite excited.. This was full power maxed out with heavy pellets! I have tuned many unregulated FX’s and at full power the curve is all over the show.. normally with a PCP maxed out you will see a curve start low and come up then crash back down.. these however sat very flat and then slowly dropped off.. These rifles have well balanced internals and spring loads so will be very easy to tune and get some VERY flat shot strings!

Just looking at those numbers and using the same pellets Id probably detune the .22 to 900-910fps to flatten it out and get more shots and the .177 to 950fps
However the pellet will be determined by the accuracy testing.

Regulators, Yes it can be done and the cylinders internals lend itself well to that mod would bring even better strings but I will leave that to the mods section of the review.

The “could” use aluminum tube with the same OD and reduce the capacity, new caps and new valve without changing the length of the tube… Would probably take too much time and money to actually make it pay off.

But you are totally right, the cost of Ti vs. steel vs. aluminum at that scale is irellevent.

What I could see as an issue is the intergirty of the tube production. Russia made some crappy batches of Ti sheet (big batches) that were useless for stressed applications.

Ti is some fussy stuff. I had a mate doing Ti bicycle frames while we did steel, if the welding wasn’t ‘proper’ you might as well of had bubble gun holding the tubes together. 😯 Machining that stuff is a pain as well, gotta be patient and keep it cool.

I was never a fan of the Ti bikes, too flexy for the weight. Sure you could make it stiff, but that meant heavy. Amazing stuff for stress cycles though, it is flexible and won’t crack even after tons of use (granted you machined and welded it properly).

Great review WM. Would you say it’s based on the R2 (early) Edgun internals? That hammer/bolt interface reminds me of that cutaway video someone did a while back and I thought they messed up the Ed internals… 😀

Looking forward to see how it shoots and uses air! 😉

The cost of titanium to an air gun factory as big as Snow Peak is nothing but pocket change.. these rifles will be produced in the tens of thousands so Ti bought in bulk for the manufacturer has got to be cheaper then buying the odd foot or two at jacked up retail or even wholesale prices.. to change the material on this cylinder would mean changing every part that attaches to it also.. the wall thickness on a tank that size would also have to increase with any change of material (apart from Durailium, even more expensive) to about 1/4″ and would stand out like dog balls in a lack of air capacity..
The fact that Snow peak are using this material to be able to use a larger cylinder for shot count says to me that the Ti is here to stay. They use 7075 T6 on the much smaller diameter cylinder on their S400 clone with only 250cc so if they wanted to the could have just used the same tubing for the P12.. however they didnt, they went for max volume.
To get the same volume in aluminium tubing the cylinder would have to be very long or about 2″ in dia, for example, the 1-1/4″ 7075 T6 they use on their S400 clone has a wall thickness of an 1/8″ that make the internal diameter 1″, If they wanted to use the larger 1-1/2″ tubing the wall thickness would have to be 1/4″ to increase the yield strength meaning the internal diameter is still going to be the same as the 1-1/4″ tube,at only 1″! All that would achieve is the need for a longer cyl and it will extra weight… hence the Titanium… :8:

Crosman…

See: “Rogue”

I wouldn’t worry about the baitAnd switch… where are these ideas coming from lol.

A quick search online at Titanium Joe’s shows it at about $54.00 / foot. This is a good point F&D, I have experienced a good deal of bait and switch with Chinese manufacturers and this practice is well known. I say this thread will document the perceived value of the unique Ti air tube for prospective owners and will serve to call the maker on the carpet if that detail changes. I do like the Ti tube for weight and balance.

P.S. Cudo’s to Wing, as 99% of reviewers would not have even found this out unless the maker was crowing about this detail.

Viewing 15 replies - 406 through 420 (of 451 total)

1 2 3 27 28 29 30 31
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.