Q:

Crazy idea?

Could a person cut off the top rail in such a way so as not to destroy their gun? I was thinking if a person had the ability to unscrew the top half, they could make clearance for Jims E-Tac with gauges and foster fitting. Couldn’t you thread the base of the handle? Or another way would be to “re-angle” the back edge more vertical to make more room. What do you think?

General Chat

All Replies

Viewing 7 replies - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)

1 2
quote SAVAGESAM:

Y.N. How do you think the Long E-Tac would fit an average (5’9”-5’10”) man?

I’m 6’1″ and it fits me fine, and I have the Morgan adjustable on the end and it still fit’s fine.

Certainly worth it to still be able to unscrew the bottle in field.

–edit– this is how I used that chopped frame. The shorter version with the red-dot on it is awesome. Just swap optics in your head, I dont have a pic.

Current config, shoots better than any other config I own. Almost rivals the S410, in accuracy, and definitly trumps the s410 in power.

quote WalkonKing:

Airforce really should mill out the back of the scope rail for clearance so a small gauge or fill nipple to be used.

This could be done without sacrificing any of the stiffness the trirail affords….

Y.N. How do you think the Long E-Tac would fit an average (5’9”-5’10”) man?

It could be done.

Airforce really should mill out the back of the scope rail for clearance so a small gauge or fill nipple to be used.

I personally like the way the talon tank fill but I also bought the Talon because it was a take down rifle and did not need a big case to transport.

I like keeping the gun in the take down configuration.

Damn, Yellow Ninja, that is one sexy bitch of a gun!!!!

Regards,
Jim

Crazy Talk –

BUT I wouldnt recommend that just to be able to use an E-Tac – I’d get a longer E-Tac –

Viewing 7 replies - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)

1 2
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.