Is it legal to have a shroud that screws on barrel Maryland?
I read the laws I was able to find and from what I seen it says anything that can be attached to firearm to muffle sound. But pretty much anything could be attached to firearm even plastic bottle to alot other things. I didnt see anything of how if it attached a certain way to my airrifle or not it would or would not be legal. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Who could I contact to find out if its illegal or not?
All Replies
Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
God bless Justice Thomas! The National Firearms Act of 1934 which created the tax stamp requirements mentioned by Adam above focused on “possession” rather than “intent”. The changes made in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 defined any part for a silencer as a silencer and thereby criminalized the possession of even an individual baffle or wipe. Intent was not necessary in the operational and prosecutorial view of the ATF since the law did not actually speak of intent to possess or knowledge of possession.
I remember reading Thomas’s majority opinion in a major case back in the early-mid ’90’s in which the court ruled that intention and knowledge of possession were prerequisites for prosecution and conviction. IIRC, a man had purchased an AR15 from a private citizen, and when firing it on a range, discovered in public that it would sometimes fire multiple rounds with one trigger pull. He was prosecuted for “possessing” a machine gun, even though he had no before-hand knowledge of his possession or intent to possess an automatic weapon. The ATF prosecuted him because the law required only that he possess the automatic weapon, _not_ that he actually know that he possessed the automatic weapon.
The court ruled that while ignorance of the law might be no excuse, intent of some sort is necessary for the commission of a crime, and they overturned the conviction. (Of course, this came only after a ruinous legal and personal experience on the part of the owner, which is why an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!)
Of course, none of this means any individual state can’t ruin your life under their own, non-federal laws and regulations. It is better to be safe than sorry, so buy and register something that will serve your purposes. You can even apply for a tax stamp to produce your own suppressor under the Form 1 provisions.
There are a number of fine, light-weight, user-serviceable .22 suppressors on the market today in the 3oz. – 4oz. weight range, notably the Gemtech Outback IID and the newest AAC Pilot, as well as others. For the best current information, check out Silencer Research’s website. (Disclaimer: I have no financial interest in Silencer Research.)
My two cents.
Great topic and there is no clear answer at this point. Whether the govt would prosecute depends on the a lot of things like the intent of the user to detach a device that is capable of silencing a firearm with the intent of putting it on a firearm. I called my local BATF when I first purchased my Marauder and they said the intent of the purchase and usage was for an airgun. Just never put it on a firearm (of course it was a shroud rather than a separate device but even if it could be removed) and never use it in a crime on the airgun, They told me at this point they were more concerned with the increasing power of airguns than the noise they make or not but the power might be a way for some liberals to grab control of some or all airguns eventually. (we have legal deer hunting here in Missouri with air guns and firearm silencers and machine guns are legal with an stamp). I suspect we will see legal movement when an airgun silencer is found retrofitted to a firearm used in a crime.
If yes then you need a tax stamp
BATF regulations are quite clear on this fact…if it can be removed, and screwed onto a firearm, and it silences the report by even one decibel, it needs to be registered with the Feds.
Barring a criminal background, it is not that hard to get a fully automatic weapon, or a silencer tax stamp. (Did you notice I did not say ‘license’?)
Remember, it is not YOU that is registered to own a silencer, it is the individual silencer that is registered with a Federal tax stamp. One stamp per silencer, or fully automatic weapon.
Any good Class 3 firearms dealer can help you with the process. It is not that difficult to do. You do need a reasonable excuse to possess one, ie: collector, hobbyist shooting inside private residence, etc.
The BATF considers “permanently attached” not to include glues or other fixatives that can be removed with heat, or chemical based solvents. Permanent means it is, or has become, a permanent part of the air gun on which it is installed.
Hope this helps.
Hoot
The airgun has nothing to do with it. The question is can it be screwed on to a firearm barrel and silence the shot.
If yes then you need a tax stamp
Sorry about the confusion thenoid. I meant it for states in where an airgun is not a firearm.
The law reads that an air rifle is a firearm in CT.
easiest thing i can see to go about this is to permanently attach it to the end of your barrel. put some epoxy on the threads to seal it up.
It should be easy to avoid that law if you dont own any other firearm. They dont arrest you for having one, it is the intent to use it on a firearm that makes it illegal, and if you don’t own one then you’re good.
I was just reading the laws for CT, and it is legal but you need to get a license for it. Any device that shoots a projectile is considered a firearm. That means an airsoft gun can land you a felony charge in this fuckt up state. I bet that license would be a pain in the ass to get.
Oh no! Now you did it…. 😮
This question often starts a shit storm! 😆
Numerous post on this. I think the consensus is do it at your own risk. If silencers are legal in your state I would get a tax stamp.
Viewing 11 replies - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
pretty good Hoot with couple exceptions
ATFE requires no excuse or reason why you want the NFA device
now your local CLEO, {chief law enforcement officer} that signs off on your form 4 might but you can easily avoid having to deal with getting some badged pinheads permission by registering your NFA under a corporation
the NFA actually exempted Corporations as back in 35′ every major one had their own goon squads, often heavily armed and tasked with murdering strikers.
anyways the local CLEO was usually elected by the people and the concern was he might deny the Corporation from arming up in paramilitary fashion so they were specifically exempted.
the case you are referring to was the John Lawmaster case out of Tulsa OK
BATF raided his house while he was at work, when he returned he found his house draped in yellow barrier tape, a SW on the door and his AR15 stolen
he was charged with possession of an unregistered machinegun as his AR had a couple M16 parts in the lower, {real common in aftermarket builds}
never made it to SCOTUS, case was tossed out by the federal district court on the grounds that Lawmaster had no clue
the case you are thinking of was one recently in Wisconsin where an AR15 was doubling and tripling at the range resulting in the owner getting tagged by ATFE.
he was convicted, is in prison pending appeal
DOJ never advanced the Lawmaster case to SCOTUS for this very reason
the precedent set by it only applies to the 10th Circuit
the Wisconsin case is 7th Circuit so was open to prosecution
on the matter of permanent attachment
remember this is not being attached to a firearm and this is why moderators on BSAs, Daystate, ect are glued in place from the factory
the glue helps reinforce that the device is intended to be used on an AG
the case in 1st Circuit was a Sam Yang with a threaded moderator
the owner, a convicted felon was found guilty but that case was overturned on Appeal due to total lack of intent
heck ATFE even raided the guys brother looking for any gun they could attempt to tie to the moderator but none was found
that’s why the case was overturned…zero proof of intent
that said that remains only a 1st Circuit precedent…
as another pointed out and I have said many times before the issue only becomes capable of prosecution if they can show some manner of constructive possession coupled with intent
what this means is there needs to be some nexus where a firearm is available for the device to be fitted to and no, it doesn’t need to have the barrel threaded for it either
I forget how many hours FTB is allowed to modify items to establish constructive possession, recall it is like 12 hours of shop time
in the Maddi Griffin kit raid FTB took 9 hours to machine one of Stewarts kits enough to detonate a .50BMG primer
the barrel was literally taped in place during the test and would have been a pipe bomb had they actually shot it
ATFE really is not concerned with moderated AGs
they ARE getting hissy about high power & big bore AGs but have absolutely ZERO authority to regulate them
how long it remains that way remains to be seen