March 3-24×42 FML-T1 Reticle
Have a look at this x-mas tree reticle! My only concern is the thickness at max magnification, I fear it might be a tad too thick for my liking
https://www.marchscopes.co.uk/tablet/march-3x-24x42mm-moa-or-mil-radian-zoom-rifle-scope.html
All Replies
Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
SFP scope is not more accurate. But the shooter will be more accurate with a nice thin reticle that does not obscure the Target. I had a FFP but the reticle got so thick at high magnification that i could not even see the bullseye because of it. So I was not very accurate with that rig. But a SFP will always have that nice thin reticle that even at 30x will not obscure the bullseye and so be a lot easier to shoot accurately.
Not all SFP scopes have thin reticles however, UTG has thick ones
Good and very useful info my brother Brian…i never knew that the SFP scopes are more accurate then FFP scopes…..
most of the time when i see those scopes (like March, S &B, Vortex ….etc ) my love will be renewed and i like to buy one …but then i remember that i have EdScopes…which is enough for my air rifles….
There is no doubt that a pure target gun is best equipped with a SFP scope. My definition of a target gun is where a guy goes to competitions with his rig. I target shoot all the time but my purpose is to hone my hunting skills. For this reason I always target shoot with my hunting guns. I have come to the conclusion that the fixed power scope makes the most sense for my application.
I’m not a fan of competitions, I live in a huge metropolis. When I pick up a gun I want some solitude. That’s just me however.
Yeah, in all honesty I prefer a nice thin SFP reticle. Always the same and perfect for paper punching. I feel like I need two guns with two different scopes. One dedicated to Target shooting and one dedicated to hunting.
The problem with this reticle is how much holdover you lose when at top magnification. I think a scope like this is best suited on a firearm. Given the relatively poor ballistic coefficient of the pellet, an air gunner needs a lot holdover You’re giving up a lot of options and spending a large sum and forced to make compromises
Wow, was that price in USA dollars or something else.
To rich for my blood.
Mike
Viewing 7 replies - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
The March 3-24-52 you’re looking at with the FML-T1 reticle is only offered in illuminated and it’s a $3K scope. The 3-24×42 does not come with this reticle as I’ve asked the US distributor. March like Leupold charges a crazy amount for the illuminated option.