Q:

Minicompressor in the works look here!

Anyone heard about this?

So the man who made HPA what it is today (yeah that’s right it was a paintballer) is working on a mini compressor that will fill tanks up to 3000 psi and be an affordable (albeit slow) unit for the average joe.

Here is a quote on the subject from Tom Kaye the guy working on the project:

“I am happy to report the prototype is working VERY well and has filled a 68/4500 in about 20 hours. This is with a 16 RPM motor! (am I good or what?)

This was using an 85 psi shop compressor feed which is really what makes the difference. The shop compressor hardly runs at all. For the people that didn’t catch this in the other thread, a 68/4500 holds about 11 cubic feet of air when full. Your typical shop compressor puts out 90 psi at 5-10 cubic feet PER MINUTE. This means it should only have to kick on 2-3 times during the entire fill.

The motor takes about 1 amp so the cost to fill a tank will be about 25 cents in electricity plus a few minutes on the shop compressor.

The pump generates ZERO heat at this rpm. This is contrary to predictions made by “knowledgeable” people on the pellet gun forums. This also means what the gauge says is in your tank is actually IN YOUR TANK. No pressure loss from cooling after the fact.

I am not getting any water in the system but I live in a dry climate. I am going to suggest that you put a water trap on your shop compressor. Adding a water trap will add expense to the product (I might offer it as an option).

Everyone was speculating on filling a scuba tank. Typical scuba’s are 80 cubic feet at 3000 psi. Given you can fill 11 cubic feet in a day, you should be able to fill a scuba tank in a week or maybe a bit less. This is an ESTIMATE so don’t hold me to it.

The fill rate is linear. Leaving something in your tank will help proportionately cut down on the fill time. Likewise topping off a scuba that’s gotten half way down is a real possibility.

Maintenance, yep your going to need to rebuild the thing once and a while. The o-rings are under a lot of stress but the good news is that you only need to replace 6 that take the most abuse. I have not had to replace any of the urethane o-rings yet and its been running for weeks. I have been lubricating it regularly, something I know a lot of you don’t do until it breaks. I am not going to the expense of putting gauges on every stage. You will need to monitor your fill rate and if it takes too long you should just replace the 6 o-rings.

I am making decisions on things like the quality of the pump shafts. As an example, you can get plain steel, chrome plated steel and hardened – chrome plated steel. The choice of shaft determines the robustness and time between rebuilds. If you tell me your going to use it once a month when you tinker with your marker, then you will be out of paintball before you have to mess with the compressor. If the majority of people tell me they are planning on filling their scuba tanks every week, the price is going to go up.

I am trying very hard to make this affordable for all players. Now I need your feedback on how often you expect to use it so I can design it properly.

Thanks!

AGD

Answers to additional questions in this thread:

Its currently running at 16 rpm because I did all the testing and baselines at that speed. I have 96 rpm motors to try next but have not gotten to it yet. The design is NOT finalized and its unlikely that the 16 rpm motor is going to be in the production model.

Without the shop compressor feed it would take several days to fill the tank (but would do it eventually).

Will higher input pressures from the shop compressor make it fill faster? In theory yes but in reality no. The motor is sized to the pressures in the first stage particularly. If you overpressure the input it will likely freeze up the motor and burn it out if your not there to catch it. I am going with 85 psi because almost every shop compressor puts that out.

This compressor will not cost less than 300 dollars and I am trying hard to keep it under 500. The motor is a huge expense and unless I can get them in China cheaper, its MORE than 200 bucks just for that. The motor is a big factor in the noise and reliability.

The chassis everything mounts too has to be heavy steel so it doesn’t move. The prototype is mounted on 1/2″ thick aluminum plate 2 feet long by 1 foot wide and the motor FLEXES the plate every go around.

The price difference between a best-of design and a minimum design is hundreds of dollars not 10’s of dollars. A best-of design would have ball bearings not bushings, quiet, high quality, last forever motor made in America, brass instead of aluminum piston housings, hardened and plated shafts etc. Having just said all that, I don’t think THAT design would be less than 500. There is a reason no one has done this before.

From what I am seeing here it looks like the compressor will run one week a month for the average customer. You have to realize how many hours this is. 7 days X 24hrs X 12 months = 2,016 hours of run time per year. To put it in perspective, a full time job = 2,000 hours a year. Imagine hooking your marker up to a machine and have it shoot paintballs all day every weekday for a year. How long would you expect it to last?? This is why there is such a quality consideration here. If it wore out in 250 hours you would be complaining because that was only a couple dozen fills.

I am listening to you and working hard on it.

UPDATE 12-10-09

I am now working with the 95 RPM motor and its filling a LOT faster. Estimates at this point are 6-8 hours for the standard 68/4500. It may be possible to downsize the motor to one less costly and go back to the 24 hour fill. I also have to try boosting the input pressure to 100+ psi. Don’t give up hope on the $300 price tag! ”

AGD runs a great forum where Tom does most of his posting. Look here to see more:

http://www.automags.org/forums/index.php?

Mods/Machinists

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)

1 2 3 4 5

I will post pics and an update when there is one. For now I will let walk’s comments stand on Tom and what he can do.

quote Voltar_1:

Steve NC did some number crunching and I am way off base.
There is plenty of energy capability in the fill over night scenario.

So it seems the compressor could be as simple as a 95rpm gear box with a reciprocating piston arrangement of fairly small displacement and still get the job done. The 1 amp motor will work.

Look forward to more information wrt Tom’s compressor.

My most unsavory crow is stuck in my craw……

I am wrong about this venture.

It must be Christmas

quote Voltar_1:

Steve NC did some number crunching and I am way off base.
There is plenty of energy capability in the fill over night scenario.

So it seems the compressor could be as simple as a 95rpm gear box with a reciprocating piston arrangement of fairly small displacement and still get the job done. The 1 amp motor will work.

Look forward to more information wrt Tom’s compressor.

My most unsavory crow is stuck in my craw……

I am wrong about this venture.

Takes a man to admit when he is wrong.

Steve NC did some number crunching and I am way off base.
There is plenty of energy capability in the fill over night scenario.

So it seems the compressor could be as simple as a 95rpm gear box with a reciprocating piston arrangement of fairly small displacement and still get the job done. The 1 amp motor will work.

Look forward to more information wrt Tom’s compressor.

My most unsavory crow is stuck in my craw……

I am wrong about this venture.

Tom Kaye invented the Automag paintball gun and has far more experience and success inventing then anyone here. He sold his company a few years ago.

Here is his website and some of the products he invented

When it comes to put up or shut up. Most people here should shut up because they don’t come close to putting up what this guy has accomplished.

http://www.airgundesignsusa.com/index.html

😯

Cool idea, personally i’d like to see a bit quicker of a fill, 12 hours or so for the full 86..

quote walt_in_hawaii:

Is this the grumpy Walter that everyone warned me about? If the guy wants to build it, let him. Your comments, for or against, vehemence, orgasmic praise, or whatever you want to contribute, won’t really affect his progress or lack of it. Go do a GEICO commercial, they could use your cheerfulness.

Just reading the narrative doesn’t really give me enough information to pass judgment on the soundness of any engineering going on here. I’d like to with hold that until I see some pics of the first prototypes and some data on air pressure, volumes, and parasitic losses, which is my main concern with an O ring based design. It is a completely unconventional approach from all ‘normal’ compressors I’m familiar with (i.e., using conventional pistons and cylinders in multiple stages). The O ring concept sounds iffy and I can’t see it holding up for any prolonged length of time, but due to the super slow revs, it might fly for a short time.

Personally I’d have approached it a little differently, but I’m willing to suspend disbelief until I see him come crashing down. In the meantime, what harm can a few comments on a nondescript forum in the middle of hyperspace cause? Live and let live.

walt

the math works??????

I’m all for this concept and hair on him if he can pull it off especially at the low cost.

grumpy and realist are not necessarily the same thing unfortunately often confused 🙂

So far all I’ve come up with is it takes approx 5,000Watts to raise 800psi up to 4500psi in that 68 cu inch tank. The motor he selected is 120 VoltAmps input which puts it at 100 Watts and then efficiency of electrics reduce that further to 80 Watts. That means it will take 62.5 hours to produce 5,000 Watts of work.
So can’t see it especially for $300.

we’ll see……

Is this the grumpy Walter that everyone warned me about? If the guy wants to build it, let him. Your comments, for or against, vehemence, orgasmic praise, or whatever you want to contribute, won’t really affect his progress or lack of it. Go do a GEICO commercial, they could use your cheerfulness.

Just reading the narrative doesn’t really give me enough information to pass judgment on the soundness of any engineering going on here. I’d like to with hold that until I see some pics of the first prototypes and some data on air pressure, volumes, and parasitic losses, which is my main concern with an O ring based design. It is a completely unconventional approach from all ‘normal’ compressors I’m familiar with (i.e., using conventional pistons and cylinders in multiple stages). The O ring concept sounds iffy and I can’t see it holding up for any prolonged length of time, but due to the super slow revs, it might fly for a short time.

Personally I’d have approached it a little differently, but I’m willing to suspend disbelief until I see him come crashing down. In the meantime, what harm can a few comments on a nondescript forum in the middle of hyperspace cause? Live and let live.

walt

Because general pessimism and “prove it to me!” are easier?

I expect that given the patience to wait, a solar powered compressor is possible. I’m not sure that makes the effort worth while but I’m eagerly awaiting the “fill by the weekend” pump!

quote Voltar_1:

quote pablouk:

😆 FFS Voltar, give it a rest will you.. 😆
I would imagine when Walt said’ the math works out’ it was more a figure of speech than anything else 🙄
I would say that in his mind’s eye, through experience and judging what the maker was saying, Walt thought it all sounded right. Not that he was sitting up half the night with a calculator, reams of paper and a fuckin’ big black board….

Then it is worthless, no?

Do you think it will work?

$300usd compressor that will lift 85psi to 4500psi by 68cu inch tank in 6to8 hours? and draws 1 amp yet has teh power to twist 1/2″ ally plate?

don’t see it.
BTW don’t you want answers that mean something?

Going by this guys rep’ hes not talking twaddle. It seems feasible that this system would work. The low power draw? Slow rpm and gearing would allow a lower rated motor to do the job. He states that its not a quick fill….

And rather than heckle answers from people as to why they think something is right, why not present the case for why you think its wrong??

quote RiffRaff:

This sounds similar to a post I saw about pre-pressurizing the first stage of a handpump, which in turn reduced the amount of pumps needed to fill a tank.

The more pressure you used, the harder the pump was to operate though. So keeping the initial pressure at a workable pressure would be needed to not break anything.

If Im wrong, oh well that was my understanding of it.

X2 Hes says that that big thick baseplate flexes with each pump, so I’m guessing hes got the first stage ramped up pretty high to cause that amount of strain on the second stage…

Ah, just seen 85 psi first stage. That is alot! With the hand pumps, people were talking about 10 and 20 psi…

quote pablouk:

😆 FFS Voltar, give it a rest will you.. 😆
I would imagine when Walt said’ the math works out’ it was more a figure of speech than anything else 🙄
I would say that in his mind’s eye, through experience and judging what the maker was saying, Walt thought it all sounded right. Not that he was sitting up half the night with a calculator, reams of paper and a fuckin’ big black board….

Then it is worthless, no?

Do you think it will work?

$300usd compressor that will lift 85psi to 4500psi by 68cu inch tank in 6to8 hours? and draws 1 amp yet has teh power to twist 1/2″ ally plate?

don’t see it.
BTW don’t you want answers that mean something?

This sounds similar to a post I saw about pre-pressurizing the first stage of a handpump, which in turn reduced the amount of pumps needed to fill a tank.

The more pressure you used, the harder the pump was to operate though. So keeping the initial pressure at a workable pressure would be needed to not break anything.

If Im wrong, oh well that was my understanding of it.

😆 FFS Voltar, give it a rest will you.. 😆
I would imagine when Walt said’ the math works out’ it was more a figure of speech than anything else 🙄
I would say that in his mind’s eye, through experience and judging what the maker was saying, Walt thought it all sounded right. Not that he was sitting up half the night with a calculator, reams of paper and a fuckin’ big black board….

quote walt_in_hawaii:

Approx fill times. But he’s filling a 68 cu inch, 4500psi tank versus 80 cu FOOT scuba tank, versus 88 cubic FOOT fire tank that some airgunners are running (I have 44 and 66 cu ft tanks myself for filling the guns, as well as a 88 cu in tank for the field).

walt

Would you kindly show the math?

95rpm * minutes * cc/rev = cc tank ????? like that kinda math?

I still don’t see it?

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 67 total)

1 2 3 4 5
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.