Q:

Opinions on Nikon Scope

Anyone have one of these or any opinions ?

Nikon Monarch® Scope 6-32×50 ED glass tactical.

Later

Optics/Nightvision

All Replies

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

#1 The side wheel was extremely stiff. Very hard to focus in.
#2 The finish was not even close to a $700 scope like a Leopold or a Bushnell 3200 – 6500 series
#3 Lens were milky at full mag.

No good.

Cabellas is also no good. Charged me $20 for sending it back.

Overall – no good came out my order.

Now the Sterling Diamond – WOW, that’s a scope alrighty !!

Later

I always thought the Nikon scopes were really nice with a sharp picture and really bright optics. Though I am poor and so tend to use cheaper scopes such as my Nikko Stirling Gameking so guess it really depends what your comparing them with.

Tach,

Can you be more specific??? What was wrong with your Nikon? Thanks.

I’ve never heard a Nikon called a pos before, but their customer service is another thing! 👿

Nope. I’ll save it for the Air Wolf MCT 22cal that is coming 😀

Later

Tackdriver, you gonna put that Nikko on your Edgun? That would look wild. It is probably about as long and half the weight.

Received it yesterday, it’s a piece of shit – hate it. So I sent it back today. $700 for a scope of this quality – Bah ! I just ordered a Nikko Stirling Diamond Sportsman 10-50×60 Scope Mildot. Now this ought to do the trick.

Later

I have a 6-18 x 40 Buckmaster, nice glass

SAW

No, but I have two Nikon Prostaffs and they are very good scopes. Only 3×9’s but very clear optics. Nikon is a great bang for your buck when it comes to optics.

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.