Revolution, Monsoon, Giant Stupid Test Video…
This video has caused quite a stir around various ag forums… My main question about this whole thing is if you have no marker for the first point of aim what’s to say the follow up shots were aimed at the original point of aim as the first? I won’t even get into the shitty rest they are using.
I’m not a big fan of FX rifles but this is simply a retarded way to test accuracy in my opinion.
I know a few folks has said you have to find the best ammo for the rifle… I don’t buy it for one second.
A truly accurate rifle shouldn’t be super picky with the type of pellets it’s fed. Once the supply of that specific pellet/die is gone your stuck with an inaccurate rifle, right? So how can you say it’s really accurate if there are no pellets available to shoot accurately with it? 😕
Now add a price tag in the $1500 range and I begin to think the manufacturer is trying to sell junk when they claim it’s critical to find the one pellet that works in said rifle. Even more so when they don’t actually produce or control the ‘magic’ pellet’s production.
All Replies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

My FX Royale with the st barrel is the most accurate under 100 yard rifle I have owned. I was shooting full magazine groups with it to get shot count and the average group at 36 yards was .33, the best was .20.
All with 18.1 grain Exacts, which is my hands down favorite 22 caliber pellet.
Having said all that, I think we will find that the Evanix speed is like most rifles, in that some shoot better than others, I also think that it will be a game changer.
The only real report I have read, from Chapman, claims it is the single most accurate 25 rifle he has ever shot, and he even got groups in the half inch range firing full auto.
Too bad Crosman can’t do this. I suppose it is the difference in being made in Korea as opposed to China. 😆
Regards,
Roachcreek