Seems like .20 is the oddball caliber for Air Force guns…
The majority of posts appear to relate to .22 and .25 followed by .177 with rare occurences of .20.
Seems funny, just a few years ago, one could not ask for a better long range hunting/plinking rig than an AZ tuned Rapid MKII(.20).
I almost bought one but opted for a Tony tuned Talon(.20) with 24″HW barrel. The rifle was the bomb but I ended up giving it to my niece…
What’s your take, is the .20 the least popular caliber for an Air Force frame? Why do you think so? Lack of power or accuracy compared to the .20 and .25, cost of ammo compared to the .177?
Regards,
Tony
All Replies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Beeman toted the .20 as the ultimate long range round for their guns. And indeed it was. It was much better balistically than the .177, and approaching the knock down of lighter .22 pellets. But remember this was in springers. In the spring guns, you only have so much power to work with. So the .20 would still give much better velocity than the .22 which had a bit (lot),of a rainbow trajectory in them.
The Modern PCP’s have no such disadvantage. We can tune our guns to take the .22 and .25 to as fast as it can go before accuracy suffers just below the sound barrier. Or use bullet shaped slugs to go faster than the speed of sound. So there is no advantage in .20. Only lower FPE with much lower ballistic coefficient.
In fact, I have a 12″ .20 hand lapped bbl. here that needs a new home! 😀
Mike