Tri-rail yes or no?
Hey guys, is the tri-rail still useful or is it obsolete?
All Replies
Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
The only reason I can think of is looks. Or more precisely, somebody didn’t think things through. Maybe it’s a marketing ploy to sell outrageously priced accessories.
People work to quiet their action and eliminate tank ping, but I don’t read much (so far nothing) about what happens to the rifle when that sound wave travels through the gun. A wave doesn’t distort the frame much but that tiny distortion gets amplified by a “lever” 50-100yds long. I don’t know, and I don’t know how to find out, but I do know I don’t seem to have any problems along those lines. Your mileage may vary.
John
Why in hell they go to the extra trouble and expense of cutting is so thin is beyond me. What is the point? 👿
That’s why I got one. I added a WoKgrip, the tri-rail, and a Weaver adapter under the PW window. Now my Condor prefers a firm grip. That blade-thin rail opposite the breech cutout makes me nervous. Maybe personal preference, but I prefer dealing with the extra scope height.
John
Nope, well, may-be a little, but it can asque the scope to bbl angle from time to time. AF really needs to address that paper thin breach/frame area. 🙄
Knife
Not in my experience.
Doesn’t it help with frame flex?
It’s just another chunk of not particularly well made metal between scope and rifle. Try not to use one if you can get away with it.
I like mine.
Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
IMO, I would have to use the tri-rail to get the scope up where my stiff old neck would give me a view thru the scope if I didn’t have a TTTA on one and an E-Tac on the other.