Q:

Vulcan .25 review

On Friday I received the new Vulcan .25 from Petr at TGAG. The gun came well packaged and in a nice plastic hard case with 2 magazines, a manual and fill probe with hose. My initial impressions of the Vulcan were and are very positive. The gun “feels” well built and the fit and finish are exceptional. I the wood and metal work is on par with the EDgun R3M and it is superior compared to the Cricket. The gun weighs 6 pounds 1 ounce un-scoped and it is very well balanced. The palm swell is perfect and it really aids in shooting the gun. The magazine fits well into the receiver and there is no rattle when attached. The bolt is easy to use and it has a very short throw. The bolt also has the option to lock open and this make the gun easy to insert a new magazine. The gun comes with a cocking indicator to let you know if the hammer is cocked and the pellet probe will not advance if the magazine is empty. The trigger is exceptional with a very smooth first stage and a crisp positive second. The trigger breaks at 1.4 pounds. It feels lighter however. I cannot do justice to the stock design with just words. This gun is what a bullpup should be. The for-end is perfect and it feels like a toy. The fill port beats the EDgun and Cricket. The port is easy to find on both sides of the tube and the dust cover smoothly rotates to cover the port like the old Falcon.

Shooting the gun was difficult at first. The Vulcan is so short and light that she tends to jump a little when fired. I had to fire a few magazines through the gun before I found the right hand pressure to hold the gun still while firing. The picatinny rail is a good height and it seems perfectly suited for medium rings with a 30 mm tube. The Vulcan is well balanced and short as I already have stated. This is important to note however because choosing the right scope is imperative with this bullpup. I mounted a Hawke 30 sidewinder tactical, Leupold VXIII long range 50 mm objective and a Bushnell AR-optics 4.5X18X42 and they all just didn’t feel right to me. I finally took a Vortex PST 2.5X10 FFP 32mm scope off my SPR AR and BAM! that is the perfect scope for this little bully. I promptly ordered one for this gun.

The first 150 rounds through the gun were disappointing. The accuracy was okay at 50 yards but the velocity was all over the place. The FPS ranged from 912-946 and the shot count was about 45 before it fell off the regulator. Lucky for me I own 2 EDguns and experience has shown me to be patient with a new regulator. When I had 200 shots down range the regulator settled in nicely and the gun hit 928.8 so many times in a row I thought my Chrony had stopped working. I found that 240 BAR was the perfect fill and the gun falls off the regulator at 120 BAR. I got 58 constant shots with an extreme spread of only 3.6 fps . I shot the first 40 shots with a standard deviation of 1 fps and an extreme spread of 3 fps! This regulator works very well.

Since the reader may be using my review to decide on dropping 1500 bucks on this gun I want to be totally honest. There are some items on this gun that could use some improvement. The manometer is too small. I glows in the dark but it’s still hard to see. The numbers are not well marked and since the max pressure is 250 BAR I feel like that number should be clearly marked. The bolt handle is too small. Sometimes when cycling the bolt the gets sticky. Upon investigation of the system I believe this problem stems from when the pellet skirt needs re-sizing and more than normal force is required to push the pellet into the chamber. A larger bolt ball with a longer bolt handle would give the mechanical advantage needed for a consistent bolt cycling. The gun is not backyard friendly. Now some may argue that a 50 foot pound .25 is not a suburbia backyard gun, and to that assertion I would agree. Shooting a .25 in a monopoly style neighborhood may not be wise but none the less if that’s your goal this gun is not for you. So let’s give “loud” a number. For my neighborhood loud is anything over 98 db three feet from the muzzle. Now I know I own an amazon.com decimeter and it’s not the true indicator of db but it does provide a quantitative number so for this purpose it will work. The Vulcan .25 registers 106 db three feet from the muzzle. The Cricket measures 104 db and the EDgun standard .25 is also 106 db. So this gun is sounds the same as the EDgun. The sound is louder to the shooter because of the hammer slap sitting right on the shooter’s ear. From 10 feet all anyone can hear is a whoosh. The moderator on the Vulcan does a good job at dispersing the sound and thus the sound is limited to a very short distance. I do feel however there is room for improvement with the factory LDC.

The question that you should be asking at this point is “would you buy the gun again?”… YES. The gun is wicked accurate, super compact, well balanced and super fun to shoot. I am very happy. The Vulcan is a very purpose driven gun however, it is made for hunting and posting. This would not be my first choice for a bench rifle. Horses for courses as they say. I hope this review was helpful and enjoy the photos. Thanks to petr for hand delivering the gun to me and making sure I was happy with the gun.

Gun how it comes from the factory

At the bench

Cocking indicator

Fill port and dust cover

Fill port is easy to get to

EDgun Vs Vulcan

Manometer

magazine lock is simple and well marked

Two retaining screws for the stock

trigger

Simple trigger safety (block)

Trigger group held by 4 screws

Shot string

Target at 100 yards with a2 magazine dump (18 shots) This one can shoot boys!

Airgun Technology

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 44 total)

1 2 3

So far it’s only the .22 and .25 that’s been made
any one know any different

Yes all the calibers are the same length

Is the .25 Vulcan the same lentgh as the smaller caliber Vulcans? Thanks!

yes I must admit think this is one of the best bullpups I have fired
it just gets better with use
have done a few alterations that has made it a bit more user friendly and by god dose it shoot well

with the 22 it loads no problem at all
But what has been said with the .25
I think its the pellets the some with softer skirts fly in but JSB’s and magnums the last mm is a sod to push the bolt closed but with that bolt its 100% better
cant fault the mag set up works A1

quote oakey631:

I was very excited about this gun. And I don’t mean to be a stick in the mud but this issue should be addressed. I recently inquired about the Vulcan .22 with a US Vendor and was told they didn’t know if they were going to continue carrying the Vulcan because of not being able to get parts. I was told that the company making Vulcan was more interested in filling orders then sending parts out. I guess there has been some problems with a few guns which is expected with any new release and this vender wanted to make good on it’s sale and couldn’t get parts. This is not made up it came from a vendor.

Oakey

My experience is the total opposite. Evgeny has been more than willing to answer any queries and he has a vast supply of parts too. That´s something ie Ed – nor KG lately – have not been able to offer. “Came from Vendor” ? Well – change Vendor or buy directly from the source.
All that i´ve learned from US “Vendors” is from this very site. AoA as an example fucks you guys right up. A Vendor ?? We call that for “Gypsy business” over here.

I was very excited about this gun. And I don’t mean to be a stick in the mud but this issue should be addressed. I recently inquired about the Vulcan .22 with a US Vendor and was told they didn’t know if they were going to continue carrying the Vulcan because of not being able to get parts. I was told that the company making Vulcan was more interested in filling orders then sending parts out. I guess there has been some problems with a few guns which is expected with any new release and this vender wanted to make good on it’s sale and couldn’t get parts. This is not made up it came from a vendor.

Oakey

glad u like your Vulcan also.
took mine out today for the first time shooting it.
i was shooting mine in the basement at 25 yards, shooting mine out side i got too get a real feel for how loud it is.
i would say that its a loud as mine cricket compact, which too me is pretty good.

how do you like the forward cocking of the gun, it’s nice not having too take the off your shoulder and cock it.
it’s my go too gun now!
Nailed a crow with it @ 50 yards, she’s broke in now! :rofl:

Good review keyser Jorge
Goodbye lelya !

quote ya3kob.7asan:

https://vimeo.com/123752261
https://vimeo.com/123752307



Will sits on the throne
thanks

Sniperqty AirGun

While we are not allowed hunting with airguns here in Europe, very impressive though what this BP is capable of.

Thanks for sharing!

It’s a nice little gun for sure.

Good to know :thumb: Thanks!

Must be really a jewel of BP then 😀

Who has the spare cash to buy them all and compare them for us “poor” airgunners?

ATB

quote Pippo:

If I had to buy an “Old Style BP” today, choice would be between the Mutant and the Vulcan due to the excellent reviews.

For me the trigger is paramount so probably it would be the “FWB style” trigger on the Mutant as mentioned by Ernest but then I don’t know how the rest of the gun compares to each other….

:2cents:

If you can´t adjust the Vulcan trigger to your liking then you just can´t adjust. Period. Mine breaks like an Icicle at 280 grams. I can go much lower, much higher, with less first stage, more first stage, no first stage, less overtravel, more overtravel as i please. And the trigger blade position is adjustable as well. Not a problem at all. A great trigger.

If I had to buy an “Old Style BP” today, choice would be between the Mutant and the Vulcan due to the excellent reviews.

For me the trigger is paramount so probably it would be the “FWB style” trigger on the Mutant as mentioned by Ernest but then I don’t know how the rest of the gun compares to each other….

:2cents:

That looks like a Custom Rapid Bolt ….. :8:

quote fiddlefadel:

VERY VERY impressive!!! I am super impressed with the shot count and consistency not to mention the accuracy 😯 The only real negative seems to be the loudness. Any Problem with the “plastic mags”?
I have a Cricket .25 but I would like a smaller lighter .25 for hunting.

Dave

My mags work like a charm. I had my concers to begin with but now i consider the mag very good. The HS smack/ping is kinda loud but the only one hearing that is the shooter. If one wants to quiet away all the muzzle noise then go ahead and add an LDC on it. The shroud end cap is threaded on so it is just a matter of time before screw-on adapters will appear. My UK friend has already made a bit longer CF shroud to his .25. I prefer add-ons though just to keep the length at bay when absolute silence isn´t needed.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 44 total)

1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.