<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talonairgun | mash0101 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://talonairgunforum.com/members/mash0101/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://talonairgunforum.com/members/mash0101/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for mash0101.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:06:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de91582f32bfde334d9e730cabdfb874</guid>
				<title>mash0101 replied to the topic 4500psi and microbore vs nonmicrobore hose ?? in the forum General Chat</title>
				<link>https://talonairgun.com/forums/topic/4500psi-and-microbore-vs-nonmicrobore-hose/#post-107169</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 03:48:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pm to bone, I pass on that 5 footer.  That is a very good price.   Saw is more deserving than me.  I need to settle on a tank first.  No cart before the horse.</p>
<p>Thanks savage for the tip on the 106.  Microbore or not, with a 106 it really doesn&#8217;t matter much.  I do scuba, and hadn&#8217;t thought about any tanks that size. I&#8217;d been concentrating on scba&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-254161"><a href="https://talonairgun.com/forums/topic/4500psi-and-microbore-vs-nonmicrobore-hose/#post-107169" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>