CNBC ‘Remington Under Fire’ Investigative Report.

Only 44 percent of affluent consumers bought in 2009 for personal luxuries by 10 percent in 2006, says Pam Danziger, president of Unity Marketing and author ofWOW Gold the commissioning of the Luxe Back in luxury. They were in WOW Gold on sale company. According to indulge Danziger, who scrimp and save in all areas of their life to aBuy WOW Gold brand items also snapped their wallets shut. Danziger has found that many of these so-called “intent” Shopper young adults aged 18 to 29 years old – the millennial generation – which do not abound yet been reached. That has not stopped from cultivating a desire for labels, thanks toWOW Power Leveling indulgent baby boomer parents. Unfortunately, millennials also hit hardest byAion Gold the recession. Although well-trained and digitally savvy, 37 percent of them are unemployed, the highest rate for this group in more than three decades after the Pew Research Center.

😕 Well that sucked.

First off, why was 3/4 of the video spent talking about a show and how it came to be? Absolutely nothing to do with the gun.

Second, it is one family that had no problems with their rifles. I had one and didn’t have a problem. Several here have ones and haven’t had problems.

This is about the fact that remington had a design, and they were told it was unsafe. There were people experiencing it, and the designer himself told them there was a problem. But instead of fixing it, they just made it anyway.

That is the real problem here. And their response had absolutely nothing to do with that. It sounded more like an advertisement than a response.

This is a sue happy country that wants to blame everyone else. If someone has a rifle that hasn’t been maintained or has been improperly altered, and it shoots when it shouldn’t, it is absolutely their fault. However, on the same note, if a brand new rifle shoots when it shouldn’t, it is the companies fault. People always look at the users pointing blame, but the company is doing the same thing.

Like I said, it isn’t the odds of whether one will or won’t have the problem. It is the fact that they can, remington knew about it, and they didn’t do anything about it.

Hello,
I do some digital work for Remington. If you’re looking for a credible source, check out Remington’s response to CNBC’s program: http://www.remington700.tv
Hope this helps clear up some confusion.
Best,
Jose

saw just send it to me ill take care of it for ya
we dont want anyone gettin hurt in cali with that thing
ill cut her up and dispose of it
ill even pay shipping to me

And also, I still don’t know what the real prob prob is with the gun
What exactly is the issue?
What, it fires when it wants to ???
If the gun is sitting around with out a round it can load itself ?
Ya know what, BS if you ask me

SAW

It’s not BS, not completely at least. On the show they actually talked to the man who designed the rifle. He said he knew there was a flaw in the trigger design, and he told remington about it, but they didn’t do anything to fix it.

It is true that if you don’t point the rifle at anything you don’t want to shoot you are being much safer. But my 700 was a 300 ultra mag. If that rifle acidentally shot, even if I wasn’t pointed directly at anyone, it could still do damage. If it was pointed up at all, it could go a long way and still do damage when it hit. If it was pointed at the ground, it could ricochet, or simply hurt someone from the spray of stuff that would come off the ground when 4500fpe hit it.

Point is, even being as safe as possible, it could still be very bad. Which is why remington really should fix their triggers and not just include a manual that tells you safeties aren’t 100% reliable.

It is being blown out of proportion. But even so, it is a problem that should be fixed.