Q:

3 Regulated FX Royale 500s: Updated (QC issues)

After much research and deliberation, two friends and I each decided collectively and individually that the FX Royale 500 w/reg would be our next airgun. After they saw my Talon SS at a recent airgun get together, they both decided they wanted their first PCP. I have had the itch for a .25 for a few months, so this was a perfect opportunity to do the research and pull the trigger.

Other top contenders included the Daystate Airwolf MCT in .25 and Royale 400 w/reg in .22, but the FX Royale 500 w/reg edged them out. Go big or go home, so it was .25 all the way.

We all settled on the Hawke Sidewinder 30 Tactical 6.5-20X 1/2 Mildot and Holland’s Scope levels. We took delivery on Monday and unboxed them today, mounted and leveled the scopes, pumped up the tanks, and hit the range.

We got them all zeroed 2″ high at 25 yards within 6 shots each to get them on paper, then zeroed them at 50yrds. Once zeroed, groups of one quarter sized ragged hole were the norm at 50 yards. All three guns were cleaned with Patchworm kits using Ballistol then dry patches. The bores were extremely dirty.

All three of us were able to hit shotshells at 70 yards with JSB 25.4gr Kings with a one mil-dot hold over. Today was shooting for fun, next trip to the range will include paper punching for groups. The 500 is an incredibly accurate and extremely quiet air rifle.

I brought my .22 TT TSS along for the opportunity to shoot it at 70 yards since some recent upgrades. I was thrilled with the performance as I was easily able to repeatedly hit a pill bottle shot after shot at 70 yards with a 2 mil-dot holdover (35yrd zero), also with the Hawke Sidewinder 30 Tactical 6.5-20X 1/2 Mildot scope. Incredible performance for a 12 inch barrel.

All in all it was a great day of airgunning.

Other Guns

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)

1 2 3 4
quote synopsys:

Yeah because the two photos of two different rifles with the serial numbers on the wrong line in the post above are obviously fakes… 🙄

So maybe he confused the fire/safe, so the only one left to “interpretation” is the leaking bottle.

So your saying he is lying about that? 😕 Or is that OK because your lord “Steve” says the Rapid bottles leaked?

I think it’s not only whine worthy, i’d be asking for a FULL fucking refund, but good luck getting that from the conjobs at AoA, they will probably just send another rejected rifle as a replacement…

The guy is a whiner if you followed the story.
guy owes him money he cannot pay so Josh has him buy a gun on his credit card
Prior to this he posted about how snobbish the guys buying high end guns are, then he orders one
Has not even had the gun in hand and books 3 hours at a CNC shop to ‘machine’ his new gun before he even shoots the thing. Gun is late so he loses his CNC booking but still has to pay….. whine
Whines about UPS stealing his rifle and never corrects the post after he has the rifle in hand 4 hours later same friggin day…. whine
then he goes off about how shitty his new rifle is …… whine

And so I think….. serves you right you impatient twit.

See the humour in the situation?

Re: Josh’s issues:

1. Re: The mismarked serial number engraving – I’ve stated my position/opinion on it, I consider it a “blemish” (as I believe most manufacturers would), not an “A” stock product that should be sold at full price. While it may not affect how the gun shoots, IMHO it reflects poorly on QC to let that out the door, and it could negatively affect the resale value. I disagree with the analogy others have made (maybe tongue in cheek) that it will somehow be a “collector’s item” like a double stamped penny or other rare coins.

2. Re: The safety markings. I’ve handled *a lot* of firearms of various types from numerous manufacturers, and I have access to an extensive firearms library reference collection. I was and would still be considered a Subject Matter Expert in the area of firearms. It took me a few seconds to understand the operation and markings of the safety, and it was not instantly obvious. IMHO the safety markings and operation should be instantly obvious to anyone who picks up any gun, whether it’s a firearm or airgun. The markings on the FX 500 are not the most intuitive IMHO. If they want to make it clearer and instantly obvious, I would propose making the “F” (FIRE) RED which is exposed when the gun is on FIRE. RED=DEAD.

(Not my photos).

Re: Comments that someone else’s two FX guns were both shot and are tackdrivers… All three of our FX guns were tack drivers, but unfortunately they all had QC issues that were unacceptable on $1800 guns regardless of how accurate they are or were. Irrelevant.

Yeah because the two photos of two different rifles with the serial numbers on the wrong line in the post above are obviously fakes… 🙄

So maybe he confused the fire/safe, so the only one left to “interpretation” is the leaking bottle.

So your saying he is lying about that? 😕 Or is that OK because your lord “Steve” says the Rapid bottles leaked?

I think it’s not only whine worthy, i’d be asking for a FULL fucking refund, but good luck getting that from the conjobs at AoA, they will probably just send another rejected rifle as a replacement…

quote synopsys:

Looks like your not the only one that is experiencing the same issues… And more…

http://www.network54.com/Forum/79537/thread/1332445825/This+will+most+likely+be+my+last+FX+product+…

FX is going the way of Crosman. 😯

I would wait for the pics before I put any credence on his whining.

Looks like your not the only one that is experiencing the same issues… And more…

http://www.network54.com/Forum/79537/thread/1332445825/This+will+most+likely+be+my+last+FX+product+…

FX is going the way of Crosman. 😯

quote balllistic:

bogman,

Do you have a single shot tray? Any issues with the JSB Kings? We were having feeding issues with about 80% of them nose diving and hanging up and binding entering the breech. We’re wondering if it’s the gun, single shot trays, or a combo of the single shot trays and JSBs. No problems running them through the magazine.

I can tell you that with all three of my Daystate guns I had to “center” the pellet probe to get the pellets to feed straight into the breech. To find out if the probe is centered load a pellet and then use a wooden dowel to run down the barrel and push the pellet back against the probe hard enough to mark it. Open the bolt and push the pellet back out and look to see if the probe indentation is centered on the back end of the pellet.

Figure out which way the end of the probe needs to be moved to center it.
Us a small boxend wrench to carefully bend the end of the probe to center it. You may need to remove the scope to do this properly.

Worked wonders for single shot loading my MK4’s and Air Wolf.
Best,
R

awesome,daystate for the win!
quote=”balllistic”]bogman – Yes, I can understand all of those reasons and understand stuff can slip through. But to have issues with all three guns was a major disappointment for the 3 of us.

the marine – The 500 is insanely quiet for sure for a .25 putting out about 44FPE, and all three guns were incredibly accurate.

At this point, we’re going with the .25 Daystate Air Wolf MCT Tactical with the Milbro Huggett shroud system and won’t be looking back.[/quote]

quote synopsys:

Didn’t see the numbers on the wrong line, only figured it out after rereading your other post.

Looks like a programming/machine translation error rather than a possibility of a copy (which was more of a joke really). I’m sure FX would be very on top of copycats. 😉

Haha. I’d never put it past the PRC…

Didn’t see the numbers on the wrong line, only figured it out after rereading your other post.

Looks like a programming/machine translation error rather than a possibility of a copy (which was more of a joke really). I’m sure FX would be very on top of copycats. 😉

quote synopsys:

Are your’s and Pete’s rifle the same?

Look at the stock at the power adjustment knob… 😕 😯

No serial number, hmmm, very strange, any possibility it’s a copy? 😯

Very odd if you ask me. 😉

My gun and Pete’s gun are 2 serial numbers apart, both reg’d 500s. They’re both genuine FX, just ones with some serious QC issues that went out the door. Never noticed the difference in the cutout for the power wheel on our 2 guns! Very odd..

Are your’s and Pete’s rifle the same?

Look at the stock at the power adjustment knob… 😕 😯

No serial number, hmmm, very strange, any possibility it’s a copy? 😯

Very odd if you ask me. 😉

quote Airgunner:

You ought to get the MVT model, it has a built in crony!!
Also, you might want a scope like this to put on it 😯 😈 😯

It’s ONLY $3195 !:shock: 😯

Found here:

http://www.topairgun.com/product/SBFT

The MVT had some issues based on a lot of reports. It was a little too complicated 😉 MCT is the way to go.

Sweet scope, out of my league, costs more than the Wolf MCT Tactical and that says a lot. I have the “poor man’s version”, a Hawke Sidewinder 30 Tactical 6.5-20X42 1/2 Mildot which is a great scope for the money IMHO. Love that etched reticle and the optics are good enough for 120 yard max I’d probably be comfortable on small game.

You ought to get the MVT model, it has a built in crony!!
Also, you might want a scope like this to put on it 😯 😈 😯

It’s ONLY $3195 !:shock: 😯

Found here:

http://www.topairgun.com/product/SBFT

bogman – Yes, I can understand all of those reasons and understand stuff can slip through. But to have issues with all three guns was a major disappointment for the 3 of us.

the marine – The 500 is insanely quiet for sure for a .25 putting out about 44FPE, and all three guns were incredibly accurate.

At this point, we’re going with the .25 Daystate Air Wolf MCT Tactical with the Milbro Huggett shroud system and won’t be looking back.

let us know,I want a 25. and I liked the royal because of it superior shroud. I love my air ranger in 22, but the fracking thing is loud in factory specs/needs more shrouding..

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 56 total)

1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.