Q:

FX Impact and problems, Not me

There seems to be a few good ones out there, and I am talking a few,
I think the FX Impact was a rushed design, or just a bad design, Seems like there is a large amount of these guns that have got major problems.
I know , I know Ted did this and that with his Impact, But Yea, I would buy Teds gun for the same price, :rofl: A one off, blue printed Impact,
Now people will say there are some good designs out there,
But, Me I would not buy a FX anything,
Just to many better guns ( I think) In the lower and even same price range,
I will also be posting this on AGN and see how long it last,
:rofl: :rofl:
Mike

FX Air Rifles

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 59 total)

1 2 3 4

Not kook , cuck! Google is your friend here. I’ve yet to see anyone win any BR matches with a non mechanical bipod. Only in ebr has this occurred. Explain how he’s been successful with off the shelf utilitarian equipment? Practice and wind reading surely did play a factor but the rest of your story doesn’t add up. We aren’t lying here Mr. McCuckins. We are simply saying that the ebr match appears fishy on the outside looking in

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

quote Leadbetter:

Prove he didn’t use special equipment u fuckin cuck!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jesus! You can’t even insult someone without making yourself look like an idiot! It’s spelled “KOOK” you imbecile!

I haven’t read any other responses other than Crickets which is the best theory that anyone has been able to give thus far – that a PROTOTYPE is better than production. Are you saying that’s why there’s such a rush on every brand new model that comes out? Only the first few are the best? I’ve watched, and experienced, quite the opposite in the real world time and time again. I know for a fact that upgrades have been made to the internal design to make the newer models better and more reliable. That would suggest that Ted’s rifle is actually a lesser design than what is being sold retail.
Undeniable proof? Sorry, not a winner.

You guys enjoy your banter about me and how I exposed your lies. I have solid undeniable proof and, frankly, I’m simply too busy to keep going around in circles over theories and opinions with zealots such as yourselves (some that have spelling issues) who blindly follow the leader. I told you I would provide proof when someone stepped up with their undeniable proof. It’s been 3 MONTHS and no one has been able to do it.
I may peek in once and a while just to call you out on your next lie. Till then, tata!

BTW, Don’t you think it’s odd that I’m supposed to go to AGN, which many of you groupies have bashed again and again for censorship over this very type of thing, to find out the truth which you say can only be found here on the Talon forum. I’m supposed to look for unnamed topic that was posted by unnamed person? lol No, I’m not doing your research for you. Nice try though. Maybe Leadbetter can do it for you since he stated that he has so much time to shoot everyday (yet no time to put his money where his mouth is and show up at a competition to prove it). If you do find it, send it in a private message to me as I have no plans on returning to this thread.

So, get to work! The masters are watching and they want you to tow that line as best you can… It’s the only way you can keep this group of lemmings together. Tow it, TOW IT!

double post

Where u @ upskirt? Let’s talk about how someone wins BR matches using a bipod!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

7000 Impacts sold

Me, I just want one thing I want to know about Fx industry ….! :whistle:
The number of employees….
the number of sales on each model….The time a quality control takes on each rifle ! lollll :tag:

I’m sure everyone will laugh … as with my english :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Be nice if upskirt would share a little proof that Ted didn’t use special equipment… We’re waiting

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was design to be a maximized money making apparatus from the get go …. free entrepreneurial destinations by design, business 101 money making schemes or what ever u like to call it’s business dog eat dog.

… no need for any proof to have just good O basic instincts to what’s owners are experiencing, good or bad it’s what happens when 1 buys into anything. Just buying anything Airgun can be as hard to figure when there’s so much of your money on the line, so spend it wisely guys.

~ Greg

go ahead and buy one, and you can ask for technical support/help on airgunnation
:rofl:

very good for tuners, money making apparatus

quote BentSkirt:

The last 3 posts provide no proof that Ted’s Impact is a specially “blueprinted” rifle. He’s got a longer shroud tube than most. That’s the only difference.

@ Cricket – No one ever said that Ted has or has not had any issues with his Impact. That’s a totally different topic. Seems to me like he has spent an incredible amount of time with his rifle making it do what he wants it to do. Maybe he has had issues and has just fixed them? It would just be speculation. It’s ridiculous to say this is proof of a blueprinted rifle. Especially when you have nothing to back up the claim of him not having any issues.
Do you actually think that a dealer recently refusing to sell Impacts is undeniable proof that Ted received a special blueprinted rifle over a year ago?

@ Kenskylight – I hope your not trying to put words in my mouth about Impacts having issues. I agree, that it seems like that the quality control of FX has diminished recently. A bad word/review/experience/problem/etc. will get much more attention than a positive one. Want proof? Just pick up a newspaper or watch the evening news. It’s also very well known that members of this forum will write anything they can to bash the name of FX whether the story is true or not. This is one example of that very thing…
My original question was for someone to provide proof about Irides statement of Ted having some special “blueprinted” Impact. There is no proof to this statement which is being passed around as fact.
On a side note, I’m sincerely glad you got your issues resolved, got your money back, and have moved back to enjoying shooting air rifles.


@leadbetter
“We’ve had some guys post some decent groups with impacts on here but ain’t no way these guns could hit the chigger 25 times @100” This is your version of proof? He tells you what he did and how he did it! Time, practice, and science. You start your response talking about how others shoot and then try to twist it into how the rifles shoot. These are two different things. Is the average shooter going to be able to do the same thing Ted has done simply by buying an Impact? No! But, with time, practice, and science, who knows? Is a “straight out of the box” Impact going to be able to replicate what Ted’s Impact has done? No! But, time, practice, and science would allow that owner to take that rifle to its maximum potential.

I’d concede on this if someone could provide undeniable proof that Ted has some special “blueprinted” rifle. But, no one is able to do that. It’s nothing but speculation and opinion. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with having opinions or speculations, except when they are presented as fact.
Still not a word from the person that originally posted this allegation. But, now we see two members that have jumped on the tow rope backing up a false claim, from another member without any actual proof, instead of calling him out. Have either of you taken the time to think bout that? Read it again and take some time to think about why your backing up someone that will not even defend his own statement.
If you don’t like that I’m exposing this for what it is, A LIE, then get the proof.

You realize how crazy you look right? We get it, you have a crush on Ted, nothing wrong with that. But ain’t nobody gonna read that block of text about it. I’m not going to tell you how to use a search function, but on AGN there should be a post (if it is not deleted) about how the first Impacts that were made specifically for marketing purposes (because it is a new rifle that nobody knows about so they have to be perfect). These were then used in Extreme Benchrest, I believe Fredrik Axelsson used one himself. Then people knew about them and real production started. What happened to Fredriks Impact? Ted got it.

Use the search function if you want “proof”, because if we tell you, you call us liars, so what’s the point? Have a good day.

Prove he didn’t use special equipment u fuckin cuck!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The last 3 posts provide no proof that Ted’s Impact is a specially “blueprinted” rifle. He’s got a longer shroud tube than most. That’s the only difference.

@ Cricket – No one ever said that Ted has or has not had any issues with his Impact. That’s a totally different topic. Seems to me like he has spent an incredible amount of time with his rifle making it do what he wants it to do. Maybe he has had issues and has just fixed them? It would just be speculation. It’s ridiculous to say this is proof of a blueprinted rifle. Especially when you have nothing to back up the claim of him not having any issues.
Do you actually think that a dealer recently refusing to sell Impacts is undeniable proof that Ted received a special blueprinted rifle over a year ago?

@ Kenskylight – I hope your not trying to put words in my mouth about Impacts having issues. I agree, that it seems like that the quality control of FX has diminished recently. A bad word/review/experience/problem/etc. will get much more attention than a positive one. Want proof? Just pick up a newspaper or watch the evening news. It’s also very well known that members of this forum will write anything they can to bash the name of FX whether the story is true or not. This is one example of that very thing…
My original question was for someone to provide proof about Irides statement of Ted having some special “blueprinted” Impact. There is no proof to this statement which is being passed around as fact.
On a side note, I’m sincerely glad you got your issues resolved, got your money back, and have moved back to enjoying shooting air rifles.


@leadbetter
“We’ve had some guys post some decent groups with impacts on here but ain’t no way these guns could hit the chigger 25 times @100” This is your version of proof? He tells you what he did and how he did it! Time, practice, and science. You start your response talking about how others shoot and then try to twist it into how the rifles shoot. These are two different things. Is the average shooter going to be able to do the same thing Ted has done simply by buying an Impact? No! But, with time, practice, and science, who knows? Is a “straight out of the box” Impact going to be able to replicate what Ted’s Impact has done? No! But, time, practice, and science would allow that owner to take that rifle to its maximum potential.

I’d concede on this if someone could provide undeniable proof that Ted has some special “blueprinted” rifle. But, no one is able to do that. It’s nothing but speculation and opinion. Of course, there’s nothing wrong with having opinions or speculations, except when they are presented as fact.
Still not a word from the person that originally posted this allegation. But, now we see two members that have jumped on the tow rope backing up a false claim, from another member without any actual proof, instead of calling him out. Have either of you taken the time to think bout that? Read it again and take some time to think about why your backing up someone that will not even defend his own statement.
If you don’t like that I’m exposing this for what it is, A LIE, then get the proof.

quote BentSkirt:

Round and round we go. Please provide proof of your allegations. You can’t, therefore you are backing up lies for all your worth. I’m sure you are having trouble with the fact that I at least provide some type of proof to back my statement. You are so dug in on the stories you’ve been told by people that have no means of proof that you have lost the ability to actually make a decision on your own. I would think someone that is as active as you are would have more respect for the air gunning community and at least try to find out the truth behind allegations such as this before blindly believing whatever you are told.

…Who’s little bit@h are you anyway?
Do you wear gloves when you tow that line? Or, do the masters prefer you use your bare hands?

We’ve had some guys post some decent groups with impacts on here but ain’t no way these guns could hit the chigger 25 times @100

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

quote Cricket:

So how come Ted has no issues but so many others do that a dealer even stopped selling them? What more proof do you need?

quote BentSkirt:

Round and round we go. Please provide proof of your allegations. You can’t, therefore you are backing up lies for all your worth. I’m sure you are having trouble with the fact that I at least provide some type of proof to back my statement. You are so dug in on the stories you’ve been told by people that have no means of proof that you have lost the ability to actually make a decision on your own. I would think someone that is as active as you are would have more respect for the air gunning community and at least try to find out the truth behind allegations such as this before blindly believing whatever you are told.

…Who’s little bit@h are you anyway?
Do you wear gloves when you tow that line? Or, do the masters prefer you use your bare hands?


@Cricket

Leave it, makes no sense to talk to such people.
I believe that Ted Impact is so accurate “out of the box” i have seen many accurate FX guns.

But it looks like most people which have the luck to get a accurate one are also stupid enough
an can not believe that there are also one out with many issues.

I was also one with no luck and make some Videos of my problems on YT.
I become weekly hate PMs on YT from people with good/accurate FX guns who want to tell me
i can’t have problems because they had no problems… 😐

My mails to FX were always answered, and i have got my Money back from my dealer but the bad quality control of FX is still there. :confusedn:

So how come Ted has no issues but so many others do that a dealer even stopped selling them? What more proof do you need?

quote BentSkirt:

Round and round we go. Please provide proof of your allegations. You can’t, therefore you are backing up lies for all your worth. I’m sure you are having trouble with the fact that I at least provide some type of proof to back my statement. You are so dug in on the stories you’ve been told by people that have no means of proof that you have lost the ability to actually make a decision on your own. I would think someone that is as active as you are would have more respect for the air gunning community and at least try to find out the truth behind allegations such as this before blindly believing whatever you are told.

…Who’s little bit@h are you anyway?
Do you wear gloves when you tow that line? Or, do the masters prefer you use your bare hands?

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 59 total)

1 2 3 4
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.