I like the look of the new FX Bobcat stock
just saw a picture of it and it Looks much, much better.
Still if I had one I would cut the stock down where the Mag hole is 🙂 🙂
I will be shooting a Cat .30 in a few minutes :):)
All Replies
But I like the cheek rest….I’m just sayin.
Walnut would definitely help this gun. But he has to dump that ridiculous shape….it’s a Prius…I agree.
I agree! That doesn’t look any better. Ugly but another way. Give up ,Fredrik and make a NEW stock. Preferably Walnut.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2. This POS iPhone sucks though …
I know I’m a newb….and what I say doesn’t mean much. But I still know ugly when I see it. That’s ugly. I wouldn’t buy it for $999.00 if it included the pellets. Really….I’m not BSing either. No one would buy an ugly, fast Ferrari….no one. Even if it came with free gas. That gun needs W O R K.
Dr. Steele
Ho well, I did shoot the FX Bobcat .30 today before going hunting
It doesen’t look nor feel like a Bullpup, ……it’s a carbine.
Accuracy was outstanding, trigger, balance, feel all really great.
Hoot, the only way he could lop off that butt is to make a LONGER scope rail extension, or ACTUALLY design a set bullpup scope mounts instead of retrofitting and existing action with essentially an AF tri-rail…
Once again this ‘thing’ called the Bobcat looks like a rushed second thought rifle.
But, people are paying top dollar for it so in some way he IS doing something right… 😕
😯 😯 😯 😯 😯 😯 😯
WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!!!!!
I don’t think the fore end is big enough… 🙄
This ‘new’ stock makes the old one look elegant (yeah, I realize how odd that sounds).
😐
So the skinny model became the plus size model….and still look ugly.
Look like something Arnold will use in Total Recall.
Side by side… Glad the hump and the big barrel gap is gone. You decide. 
[/quote]
The rifle looks fat as in chunky in weight..the looks like too much plastic to me.
HUMMMMMMM???????
……….TACTICAL PRIUS ??????????
……………Does come in Blue 😯
Mark
I think its difficult to operate the lever in the shooting position w/o that extra chunk out back. 😉
It’s not a bullpup. Bullpups don’t have a butt stock of more than a couple of inches. It’s some kind of Prius-like hybrid between a tactical carbine, and a bullpup.
I’d call it a tactical carbine, and as such it’s not bad….however, I’d get that hole in the stock fixed before it shipped!!!
I agree it’s better than it was, but Fredrick has this “butt-stock” thing going on….he could knock six inches off the OAL if he simply redesigned the ass end of that thing. I know six inches isn’t all that much, but it’s been enough to fill my needs for the last 70 years!
That’s my honest opinion, and I fully respect your (fuck you) differing beliefs!!! And, that’s (fuck you twice) the honest truth straight from my sincere lips!
Regards…
Kindly ‘Ol Uncle H 😯 😯 t
PS: He has the potential for a 24″ to 25″ lightweight, very powerful bullpup, in his hands. In .25 or .30 caliber, even I’d buy that!
PS PS: I edited twice to remove most of the profanity… :whoop:
He got rid of the arching hump back look. Now to block the old look out of my mind. 😀 Go Fredrik. I wonder if the weight changed?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Once again this ‘thing’ called the Bobcat looks like a rushed second thought rifle.
But, people are paying top dollar for it so in some way he IS doing something right… 😕
Agree. A good scope mounts may help it. Get rid of the AF tri-rail extension bar, it looks so cheap and unbalance.