Q:

Benjamin Rogue Bullshit detector ringing!

Does anyone here have a Rogue? Please don’t be bashful, I’m not trying to belittle anyone or call them out for anything. I just want to get some actual information from someone who bought a Rogue retail and hopefully can shoot worth a damn!

As far as I can tell, Crosman (via Chip) has backed off on initial performance claims (though in a mealy mouthed way) and are now all about versatility.

Crosman appears (to me) to have delighted in all the pre-release hype on the airgun forums but is now claiming the lack of any positive reports via airgun forums to be because they market the gun to PB guys.

There are claims that hundreds of guns have been sold and yet the buyers are strangely silent. Oh yeah, the PB guys that bought this gun would never think to ask airgunners about all that airgun stuff like tanks, fills per tank, where to get fills, best prices, best gear etc… no they get all that info from Crosman… a company with one big bore to it’s credit. Right.

I was a defender of Crosman when they announced the Rogue and still appreciate the guts to move into a new market with new technology. In fact, I’d be proud of a company that did that and failed on the first attempt! Taking a risk and losing reveals a far stronger character and work ethic than playing it safe and having mediocre success.

But now, I smell BS and I hate that! I’m not saying that new tech is suddenly bad or even that the Rogue is a bad gun, I’m saying that Crosman appears to have let bogus initial claims stand despite knowing the actual product didn’t deliver per hype. The so called “actual” performance is not well defined but doesn’t appear all that bad (energy numbers only), but it’s not close to original hype.

Way back when, it was claimed that the gun would get 20 shots at 150 FPE and 4 shots at 250 FPE. Yeah, now the gun gets 21 shots at 133 FPE (not badf at all) and 3 shots at 195 FPE. The 21 at 133 doesn’t fall that far short but 3 at 195 is a damn far cry from 4 at 250! The latest explanation from Chip (Crosman’s rep) is not satisfactory. He claims that the initial claims were based on different weight bullets. Right, a gun that shoots 175gr bullets at 250 for 4 shots can only manage 195 with 170gr bullets for 3 shots… I might have been born on a rainy night but it wasn’t last night! Shit, I’ve got more big bores downstairs than Crosman has even seriously considered but they are going to tell me (and you) what’s what?

I’m also curious about Crosman’s claim via Chip that this gun is intended to bring hunters to airguns vice airgunners to hunting. Sounds like a BS strategy to me. You can’t get a airgunner to like the gun but maybe a guy who knows no better will? Let me get this straight, sell a gun that needs air tanks and fittings and fill sources etc to a PB guy and ignore the guys that already have all the gear to support the gun? Yeah, ignore the guys that already have all the gear and are used to the hassles that airguns bring but focus on PB guys that can buy super consistent ammo from big guys or custom reloaders? Got it. It’s a good thing the Rogue only costs double what a match grade varmint rifle with a tax stamp for a silencer would cost!

OK, maybe I’m totally f’d up here, it’s happened before! So, does anyone have a link to a PB site where the Rogue is reviewed by an actual customer? Has anyone in Crosman’s self declared target market actually posted any results? Really, after hundreds of sales to these hunters that routinely post on topics like head space measurements, best powder loads, best powder types, effects of temperature on powders, bullet designs, and every other esoteric thing you can imagine about shooting, shouldn’t there be a few easily found reviews?

BTW, I did notice that Jim (echochap) has a wonderful specimen that his buddy can shoot little groups with off-hand. Yeah, my BS detector has not been silenced! This is where I gather some hate mail… Jim has a habit of going quiet on guns that suck. He also has a habit of ignoring great guns that don’t pay his way. If he ever manages to “find the time” to gather actual numbers on the Rogue, they will probably be reported accurately. However, if the numbers and accuracy are crap, I doubt we’ll ever know that he found the time…

So, I’m looking for retail customers that Crosman was unaware of to relay actual results! Has anyone besides the Crosman team shot anything with a Rogue?

Other Guns

All Replies

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 151 total)

1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11

Wow Butcher! You really gave him the what for didn’t you! 😆 😆 😆

I really gave it some thought regarding if I should apologize for being rude. I thought maybe I had gone too far and had to decide if my ego was getting ahold of my mouth. After that reflection, I won’t be apologizing to anyone about my posts on the GTA.

I believe my initial offense was correct in that JC was treating me and all others that referred to opinions and reports other than his own as fools or targets. I believe my replies were justified and supported by the facts.

I support and appreciate your message to JC.

BTW, I suspect JC found this thread while searching for decent reports on the Rogue… just a suspicion!

Butcher,

I am proud of you and your post on the off topic.

There are a lot of whores in this industry aren’t there?

Regards,

Roachcreek

Respectfully Steve, my name shouldn’t be on that list and Jerry’s should. 😉

😀

Who’s Jim Chapman? 😉 He’s certainly not a serious airgunner if he doesn’t chronograph the airguns he shoots. I’m not a gun writer, or “the best” anything. I just enjoy shooting and really like the PCP type guns. The Rogue I shot was a complete disappointment to myself and everyone else who shot it. I don’t hate crosman, or at least I don’t think I do. I really like my .25 Marauder! Oh well.

But you know Butcher, he’s just going to spin this some way. That’s the way of these types.

You know also Butcher, opinions from you, Synopsys, Tofaz, Ted, RC, Rob, Cygnus X, (just to name a few), are far more valuable and respected. When a manufacturer doesn’t listen to these real world opinions, they are demonstrating their arrogance…and that will always bite them in the ass.

quote BUTCHER45:

I wrote a lil’ sumthin for Jim Chapman down in the “Off Topic” section….I’m sure a little bird will alert him to it so he doesn’t miss another chance to be “amused”.

Very well written Butcher!

I’m convinced, unfortunately, that he will not respond here since he can’t use influence to end the conversation or have your posts erased in order to quash an argument he cannot win. 😉

Well I was one of the ones hoping that the Rouge could do what Crosman promised. I know see that the only way I’d buy a large bore from them is if they just stuck to the basic platform of the MROD.

The Mrodl seems to be a great gun for it’s price, why try to fix something that’s not broken.

Just my 2 cents.
TJ

I wrote a lil’ sumthin for Jim Chapman down in the “Off Topic” section….I’m sure a little bird will alert him to it so he doesn’t miss another chance to be “amused”.

WTF…. LOOKS Like I’ve been banded from them cock suckers as well…..
I wonder what the hell I did, Who I Pissed off, and when???? LOL

GTBJ,
Look in the “unproductive posts” section.

RC,
Did I give you that opinion? If not, I’m not certain it is current. I’ll try to get you a new one ASAP. Shall I email it or just post it on my blog?

Jerry, what is the post you’re talking about under? I can’t find it…

Roch, can’t find your either….

Good for you Jerry, too bad you can’t get close enough to whip them with your Leupold scope destroying flacid dick.

They got upset with me for posting that I used tanks “that are close to the end of their life.”

The fuckers sent me an email telling me they did not like me promoting dangerous things. But I got emails also in support of my opinion.

They did not ban me, I banned those MOTHER FUCKERS.

I just dumped on Crosman on a post on the Yellow, it under the title, “IF crosman put that stock on their guns we would all have one.”

I passiionatly believe that they knowingly have fucked the American air gun public, knowing that most guys will just eat the spoiled Chow Mein they have been selling.

Chip and Echoclap are whores for perpetuating this Rogue lie about a flawed rifle.

ie., whore, someone who does unethical behavior for money.

Regards,

Roachcreek

You Fuckin AssHole Jerry… how dare you put some fool in his place???……

BTW… we would have ya any other way! Good job :thumb:

now I need to go over to gta…. holes and see what’s left to read 😆

Boy did I get spanked at the GTA! I dumped on echochap pretty hard based on his defending the rogue by attacking the validity of opposing opinions and got banned for bashing.

I got an email about my comments being inappropriate, a post about bashing not being tolerated and this message when I went to the site and the computer automatically logged me on:

“Sorry Jerry, you are banned from posting and sending personal messages on this forum.
Insulting and just dam outright an asshole

This ban is set to expire March 16, 2012, 10:36:21 AM.”

Hmmm, let’s see… It’s OK to belittle everyone who has an opinion based on negative posts that were very well documented, especially for amateurs! It’s OK to construct a reducto absurdium (sp?) that clearly is intended to portray those with continuing doubts as fools.

But, responding to those insults delivered by a Pro Staffer makes me an asshole! Got it. Of course you guys here know I’m an asshole already so I guess that’s old news! 😆 😆 😆

Yeah, maybe I tossed in some gratuitus shots but the fact is that echochap’s entire post was a gratuitus assault on the intelligence of everyone annoyed with Crosman’s behavior regarding the Rogue and not yet convinced the Rogue has been sorted.

Butcher made it very clear in a very nice post that echochaps performance standards are a bit malleable. I’m actually OK with that, consistency is the hob goblin of little minds someone with a flair for words once said… Also, context is crucial.

The full throated defense of the Rogue and assault on dissenters by a so called independent reviewer is odd. Particularly, when the reviewer has yet to conduct simple performance testing! Yeah, OK, Jim does hunting and useage posts as a mainstream and pretty well at that. However, the whole story on the Rogue is the valve, the performance and now, having corrected issues that are hardly ancient history!

For a guy that is in the business of informing opinions, he has awful little respect for opinions informed by others. That indicates an impressive self-regard and thin skin. An amusing aside is that he posted today that his gun might not be performing to spec…which is now listed as 180FPE on high…

Funny thing is that I’m still hoping that Crosman gets this sorted out and treats us with respect. They could very easily admit to some prior hype, provide complete performance data, advise the guy who can’t get a “test gun” that to get 250 (or whatever the top is) takes dialing the valve up to max manually and settling for less on the next shot etc. They could also get Lloyd or another engineer working the controls to really take advantage of the tech and increase the performance. I really hope they do. Crosman is an american company taking risks and doing some great things. The Rogue debacle is a stain on what is otherwise a great reputation (yes, I’m aware some M-Rods had crap barrels… but all in all, I read more positive reviews regarding customer service than bad)(yeah, less customer service required would be even better!).

I love that picture of the electrical box you shot way back when! I remember you telling me that one pellet had stuck on impact…

……and here’s my 200 yard performer in 308 on the RIGHT……….

and my shamless plug of jerry SUREFIRE slugs in 25. 100 yards and recovered the slugs:

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 151 total)

1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.