Cricket or Edgun POLL
Which do you prefer and why?
I don’t have neither but looking seriously into the Cricket. To me it has all the advantages over Edgun: price, shot count, superior regulator, magazine (that works) and looks. I’m going to wait a few months to see if they come up with a .25 compact. Otherwise I think I will get the .22 tactical standard. I just love the size of the .22 standard. Would prefer the .25 but it’s a little too long for me…
All Replies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

I have been using my Std Cricket 0.22 for more than 7 months. I have tried various setting combinations of HST , firing valve spring tension and regulator setting.it proved to be very versatile gun suiting hunters ,plinkers and target shooters. You can pump it up to 200 bars only and get as many as 70 or more consistent shots of 880 fps 18 grn JSB for long range target shooting with Extreme Spread not exceeding 10FPS and SD of 1 to 2 FPS. Or you can pressurize it up to 300 bars and squeeze out more shots as powerful as 990 fps of the same pellet for long range small game hunting. Getting sub half inch 5 shot groups at 50 yards is a tedious routine.
Since I don’t own an edgun matador I can not tell wich one is better. Nevertheless, from my reading in this great forum I can tell it is a remarkable gun engineered by a talented engineer who really cares about his customers and listen to their complaints ,comments and criticism and tries his best to resolve problems and improve his guns. I do intend to get a MS R3 matador at a later stage after taking care of the malfunction complaints I am reading here about the mag. Indexing and bolt problems.
Frankly the Cricket dealer that I purchased my gun here in Kuwait has all the spares and consumables so there are no complaints in this regard. I have to admit that I wish that the Cricket manufacturer follow Ed’s steps and read this forum and listen to his guns users.